» Articles » PMID: 25752616

Comparison of Different Approaches to Calculate Nutrient Intakes Based Upon 24-h Recall Data Derived from a Multicenter Study in European Adolescents

Abstract

Purpose: The European "Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence" (HELENA) project evaluated two different approaches to harmonize the matching procedures between 24-h recall data and food composition databases. In the first approach, the 24-h recall data were linked to the local/national food composition databases using standardized procedures, while in the second approach, the 24-h recall data were linked to the German BLS database which includes a larger food list. The aim of this paper was to compare the intakes of energy and eight nutrient components calculated via both approaches.

Methods: Two non-consecutive 24-h recalls were performed in 1268 adolescents. Energy, carbohydrates, proteins, fat, fiber, water, alcohol, calcium and vitamin C were calculated via the two approaches at individual level. Paired samples t test and Pearson's correlations were used to compare the mean intakes of energy and the eight mentioned nutrients and to investigate the possible associations between the two approaches.

Results: Small but significant differences were found between the intakes of energy and the eight food components when comparing both approaches. Very strong and strong correlations (0.70-0.95) were found between both methods for all nutrients.

Conclusion: The dietary intakes obtained via the two different linking procedures are highly correlated for energy and the eight nutrients under study.

Citing Articles

Analysis of Changes in Protein Intake Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Its Influencing Factors.

Zhao H, Wu L, Zhang X, Zhang X, Zhang D, Liu Y Obes Surg. 2025; 35(3):1053-1062.

PMID: 39932525 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-025-07739-2.


Dietary Diversity and Its Association with Diet Quality and Health Status of European Children, Adolescents, and Adults: Results from the I.Family Study.

Dello Russo M, Formisano A, Lauria F, Ahrens W, Bogl L, Eiben G Foods. 2023; 12(24).

PMID: 38137262 PMC: 10743104. DOI: 10.3390/foods12244458.


Breakfast Dietary Pattern Is Inversely Associated with Overweight/Obesity in European Adolescents: The HELENA Study.

Cacau L, De Miguel-Etayo P, Santaliestra-Pasias A, Gimenez-Legarre N, Marchioni D, Molina-Hidalgo C Children (Basel). 2021; 8(11).

PMID: 34828758 PMC: 8621138. DOI: 10.3390/children8111044.


The Association between Portion Sizes from High-Energy-Dense Foods and Body Composition in European Adolescents: The HELENA Study.

Flieh S, Miguel-Berges M, Gonzalez-Gil E, Gottrand F, Censi L, Widhalm K Nutrients. 2021; 13(3).

PMID: 33809476 PMC: 7998698. DOI: 10.3390/nu13030954.


Free Sugar Consumption and Obesity in European Adolescents: The HELENA Study.

Flieh S, Moreno L, Miguel-Berges M, Stehle P, Marcos A, Molnar D Nutrients. 2020; 12(12).

PMID: 33291491 PMC: 7762126. DOI: 10.3390/nu12123747.


References
1.
Vereecken C, Covents M, Matthys C, Maes L . Young adolescents' nutrition assessment on computer (YANA-C). Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005; 59(5):658-67. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602124. View

2.
Gurinovic M, Witthoft C, Tepsic J, Ranic M, Hulshof P, Hollman P . Capacity development in food composition database management and nutritional research and education in Central and Eastern European, Middle Eastern and North African countries. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010; 64 Suppl 3:S134-8. DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.224. View

3.
Harttig U, Haubrock J, Knuppel S, Boeing H . The MSM program: web-based statistics package for estimating usual dietary intake using the Multiple Source Method. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011; 65 Suppl 1:S87-91. DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.92. View

4.
Black A . Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000; 24(9):1119-30. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801376. View

5.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View