» Articles » PMID: 25741491

Early Outcome of the Korean Diagnosis-Related Groups Payment System for Appendectomy

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2015 Mar 6
PMID 25741491
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The implementation of the Korean diagnosis-related groups (DRG) payment system has been recently introduced in selected several diseases including appendectomy in Korea. Here, we report the early outcomes with regard to clinical aspects and medical costs of the Korean DRG system for appendectomies in Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center throughout comparing before and after introduction of DRG system.

Methods: The DRG system was applied since January 2013 at our institute. After the DRG system, we strategically designed and applied our algorithm for the treatment of probable appendicitis. We reviewed the patients who were treated with a procedure of appendectomy for probable appendicitis between July 2012 and June 2013, divided two groups based on before and after the application of DRG system, and compared clinical outcomes and medical costs.

Results: Total 416 patients were included (204 patients vs. 212 patients in the group before vs. after DRG). Shorter hospital stays (2.98 ± 1.77 days vs. 3.82 ± 1.84 days, P < 0.001) were found in the group after DRG. Otherwise, there were no significant differences in the perioperative outcomes and medical costs including costs for first hospitalization and operation, costs for follow-up after discharge, frequency of visits of out-patient's clinic or Emergency Department or rehospitalization.

Conclusion: In the Korean DRG system for appendectomy, there were no significant differences in perioperative outcomes and medical costs, except shorter hospital stay. Further studies should be continued to evaluate the current Korean DRG system for appendectomy and further modifications and supplementations are needed in the future.

Citing Articles

Comparing financing models for supplementary healthcare in appendectomy: activity-based costing (fee-for-service) vs. diagnosis related group remuneration (bundled payment) - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lino A, da Cruz J, Porto B, Nogueira R, Otoch J, de Almeida Artifon E Acta Cir Bras. 2023; 38:e386923.

PMID: 38055385 PMC: 10699206. DOI: 10.1590/acb386923.


Impact of Diagnosis-Related Groups on Inpatient Quality of Health Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Chen Y, Zhang X, Yan J, Xue-Tang , Qian M, Ying X Inquiry. 2023; 60:469580231167011.

PMID: 37083281 PMC: 10126696. DOI: 10.1177/00469580231167011.


Analytical methods to assess the impacts of activity-based funding (ABF): a scoping review.

Valentelyte G, Keegan C, Sorensen J Health Econ Rev. 2021; 11(1):17.

PMID: 34003386 PMC: 8132407. DOI: 10.1186/s13561-021-00315-1.


Characteristics and related factors of emergency department visits, readmission, and hospital transfers of inpatients under a DRG-based payment system: A nationwide cohort study.

Huang P, Kung P, Chou W, Tsai W PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0243373.

PMID: 33296413 PMC: 7725315. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243373.


Effects of a mandatory DRG payment system in South Korea: Analysis of multi-year nationwide hospital claims data.

Choi J, Kim S, Park H, Jang S, Kim T, Park E BMC Health Serv Res. 2019; 19(1):776.

PMID: 31666066 PMC: 6822472. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4650-8.


References
1.
Martinussen P, Hagen T . Reimbursement systems, organisational forms and patient selection: evidence from day surgery in Norway. Health Econ Policy Law. 2009; 4(Pt 2):139-58. DOI: 10.1017/S1744133109004812. View

2.
Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier L, Peterson E, Eubanks S . Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg. 2003; 239(1):43-52. PMC: 1356191. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103071.35986.c1. View

3.
Yuk J, Kim Y, Hur J, Shin J . Association between pregnancy and acute appendicitis in South Korea: a population-based, cross-sectional study. J Korean Surg Soc. 2013; 85(2):75-9. PMC: 3729990. DOI: 10.4174/jkss.2013.85.2.75. View

4.
Fourie C, Biller-Andorno N, Wild V . Systematically evaluating the impact of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) on health care delivery: a matrix of ethical implications. Health Policy. 2014; 115(2-3):157-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.11.014. View

5.
Ellis R . Creaming, skimping and dumping: provider competition on the intensive and extensive margins. J Health Econ. 1998; 17(5):537-55. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6296(97)00042-8. View