» Articles » PMID: 20023368

The Epidemiology of Appendicitis and Appendectomy in South Korea: National Registry Data

Overview
Journal J Epidemiol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2009 Dec 22
PMID 20023368
Citations 67
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Appendicitis is one of the most frequent acute surgical conditions of the abdomen, and appendectomy is one of the most commonly performed operations in the world. However, epidemiological data on appendicitis have not been reported for South Korean or East Asian populations.

Methods: We analyzed the epidemiological features and lifetime risk of appendicitis and appendectomy in South Korea using data collected for the national health insurance database from 2005 through 2007.

Results: Appendectomy was performed in 59.70% of inpatients diagnosed with appendicitis. The overall incidences of appendicitis, total appendectomy, and perforated appendectomy were 22.71, 13.56, and 2.91 per 10 000 population per year, respectively. The incidence of appendicitis and appendectomy showed clear seasonality, with a peak in summer. The standardized lifetime risks of appendicitis and appendectomy were constant from 2005 through 2007. A life table model suggests that the lifetime risk of appendicitis is 16.33% for males and 16.34% for females, and that the lifetime risk of appendectomy is 9.89% for males and 9.61% for females.

Conclusions: As compared to results obtained in research on Western populations, appendicitis and appendectomy had a similar perforation rate and seasonality, but a higher overall incidence, in South Koreans. Between 2005 and 2007, the incidence of appendicitis and appendectomy was constant. Overall, an estimated 15 incidental appendectomies are performed to prevent 1 inpatient with suspected appendicitis, and 26 incidental appendectomies are performed to prevent 1 appendectomy. Incidental appendectomy may have greater preventive value in Koreans.

Citing Articles

Reduction in perforated appendicitis incidence between rural and urban populations after introducing social health insurance in Vietnam: A population-based study.

Nguyen T, Chou Y, Huang N World J Surg. 2024; 48(12):2964-2971.

PMID: 39489691 PMC: 11619737. DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12388.


Effect of peritoneal and wound lavage with super-oxidized solution on surgical-site infection after open appendicectomy in perforated appendicitis (PLaSSo): randomized clinical trial.

Sellappan H, Alagoo D, Loo C, Vijian K, Sibin R, Chuah J BJS Open. 2024; 8(5).

PMID: 39413050 PMC: 11482247. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae121.


The microbiome in adult acute appendicitis.

Lee M, Sulit A, Frizelle F, Purcell R Gut Microbiome (Camb). 2024; 3:e8.

PMID: 39295777 PMC: 11406380. DOI: 10.1017/gmb.2022.7.


Appendectomy and appendicitis do not increase colorectal cancer risk: evidence from Mendelian randomization.

Wei W, Wang J, Yu D, Liu W, Zong L Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1414946.

PMID: 39104723 PMC: 11298372. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1414946.


Early versus delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess.

Zhou S, Cheng Y, Cheng N, Gong J, Tu B Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 5:CD011670.

PMID: 38695830 PMC: 11064883. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011670.pub3.


References
1.
Al-Omran M, Mamdani M, McLeod R . Epidemiologic features of acute appendicitis in Ontario, Canada. Can J Surg. 2003; 46(4):263-8. PMC: 3211626. View

2.
Primatesta P, Goldacre M . Appendicectomy for acute appendicitis and for other conditions: an epidemiological study. Int J Epidemiol. 1994; 23(1):155-60. DOI: 10.1093/ije/23.1.155. View

3.
Addiss D, Shaffer N, Fowler B, Tauxe R . The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990; 132(5):910-25. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115734. View

4.
Black J . Acute appendicitis in Japanese soldiers in Burma: support for the "fibre" theory. Gut. 2002; 51(2):297. PMC: 1773321. DOI: 10.1136/gut.51.2.297. View

5.
Blomqvist P, Ljung H, Nyren O, Ekbom A . Appendectomy in Sweden 1989-1993 assessed by the Inpatient Registry. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51(10):859-65. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00065-1. View