» Articles » PMID: 27631239

Impact of Payment System Change from Per-case to Per-diem on High Severity Patient's Length of Stay

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Sep 16
PMID 27631239
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A new payment system, the diagnosis-related group (DRG) system, and Korean diagnosis procedure combination (KDPC, per-diem) payment system were officially introduced in 2002 and in 2012, respectively. We evaluated the impact of payment system change from per-case to per-diem on high severity patient's length of stay (LOS).Claim data was used. A total of 36,240 case admissions and 72,480 control admissions were included in the analysis. Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series between cases and controls was conducted. Hospitals that consistently participated in the DRG payment system and changed to the KDPC payment system were defined as case hospitals. Hospitals that consistently participated in the DRG payment system were defined as control hospitals.LOS increased by 0.025 days per month (P = 0.0055) for 3 surgical diagnosis-related admissions due to the bundled payment system change. LOS among emergency admissions also increased and showed an increasing tendency under the KDPC. The LOS increase was observed specifically for complex procedure admissions and high severity cases (CCI 0, 1: 0.022, P = 0.0142; CCI 2, 3: 0.026, P = 0.0288; CCI ≥ 4: 0.055, P = 0.0003).Although both payment systems are optimized to decrease LOS, incentives to reduce LOS are stronger under the DRG system than under the KDPC system. It is worth noting that too strong incentive for reducing LOS is suitable to high severity cases.

Citing Articles

Effects of fee-for-service, diagnosis-related-group, and mixed payment systems on physicians' medical service behavior: experimental evidence.

Li X, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Li X, Lin X, Han Y BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):870.

PMID: 35790981 PMC: 9258053. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08218-5.


Analysis of the Effects of Electronic Medical Records and a Payment Scheme on the Length of Hospital Stay.

Likka M, Kurihara Y Healthc Inform Res. 2022; 28(1):35-45.

PMID: 35172089 PMC: 8850176. DOI: 10.4258/hir.2022.28.1.35.


A surgical hospitalist system in Korea: a preliminary study of the effects on hospital costs and postoperative outcomes.

Jung Y, Jung E, Lee K Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021; 100(5):298-304.

PMID: 34012948 PMC: 8103155. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.5.298.


Characteristics and related factors of emergency department visits, readmission, and hospital transfers of inpatients under a DRG-based payment system: A nationwide cohort study.

Huang P, Kung P, Chou W, Tsai W PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0243373.

PMID: 33296413 PMC: 7725315. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243373.


Walking ability and functional status after post-acute care for stroke rehabilitation in different age groups: a prospective study based on propensity score matching.

Wang C, Miyoshi S, Chen C, Lee K, Chang L, Chung J Aging (Albany NY). 2020; 12(11):10704-10714.

PMID: 32482912 PMC: 7346049. DOI: 10.18632/aging.103288.


References
1.
Lee K, Lee S . Effects of the DRG-based prospective payment system operated by the voluntarily participating providers on the cesarean section rates in Korea. Health Policy. 2006; 81(2-3):300-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.05.019. View

2.
Hamada H, Sekimoto M, Imanaka Y . Effects of the per diem prospective payment system with DRG-like grouping system (DPC/PDPS) on resource usage and healthcare quality in Japan. Health Policy. 2012; 107(2-3):194-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.01.002. View

3.
Song J, Kim C . Participation determinants in the DRG payment system of obstetrics and gynecology clinics in South Korea. J Prev Med Public Health. 2010; 43(2):117-24. DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.2010.43.2.117. View

4.
Ellis R, McGuire T . Supply-side and demand-side cost sharing in health care. J Econ Perspect. 1994; 7(4):135-51. DOI: 10.1257/jep.7.4.135. View

5.
Ishii M . DRG/PPS and DPC/PDPS as Prospective Payment Systems. Japan Med Assoc J. 2014; 55(4):279-91. View