» Articles » PMID: 25735216

[Respiratory Viral Diagnosis by Using an Automated System of Multiplex PCR (FilmArray) Compared to Conventional Methods]

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2015 Mar 5
PMID 25735216
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Acute respiratory infections, which are commonly caused by viruses, are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in children. In Argentina, national surveillance programs for the detection of respiratory viruses are usually performed by using immunofluorescence (IF) assays, although it is well known that molecular methods are more sensitive. An automated multiplex PCR device, the FilmArray-Respiratory Panel (FilmArray-RP), can detect 17 viral and 3 bacterial pathogens in a closed system that requires only 5 min of hands-on time and 1h of instrumentation time. A total of 315 respiratory samples from children under 6 years of age suffering from acute respiratory infections, were studied by IF for 8 respiratory viruses and by RT-PCR for rhinoviruses. Later, these samples were tested by the FilmArray-RP. The positivity frequency obtained for the 9 viruses tested was 75% by IF/RT-PCR and 92% by the FilmArray-RP. The positive and negative percent agreement between both methods was 70.5% whereas the negative percent agreement was 99.6% (95% confidence interval:65.5-75.1 and 99.2-99.8 respectively). The FilmArray-RP allowed a higher positive diagnosis (97%) and detected other viruses such as coronavirus NL63, 229E, OC43, HKU1 (10%) and bocavirus (18%). In addition, this method identified multiple coinfections (39%) with 2, 3, 4 and up to 5 different viruses. At present, IF is still the most frequently used method in most Latin American countries for respiratory viruses diagnosis due to its low cost, its capability to process a high number of samples simultaneously and the fast determination of results for the most frequent viruses, which are available within 5h. However, the coming incorporation of molecular methods in routine procedures will significantly increase the diagnostic yield of these infections.

Citing Articles

Comparative Analysis of Influenza Epidemiology Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic in Argentina (2018-2019 vs. 2022-2023).

Gentile A, Juarez M, Ensinck G, Lopez O, Melonari P, Fernandez T Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2025; 19(2):e70078.

PMID: 39962921 PMC: 11832905. DOI: 10.1111/irv.70078.


An Old Acquaintance: Could Adenoviruses Be Our Next Pandemic Threat?.

Saint-Pierre Contreras G, Conei Valencia D, Lizama L, Vargas Zuniga D, Avendano Carvajal L, Ampuero Llanos S Viruses. 2023; 15(2).

PMID: 36851544 PMC: 9966032. DOI: 10.3390/v15020330.


Gendered Impact of Age, Toilet Facilities, and Cooking Fuels on the Occurrence of Acute Respiratory Infections in Toddlers in Indonesia and the Philippines.

Sulistyorini L, Li C, Lutpiatina L, Utama R, Nurlailah Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(21).

PMID: 36361461 PMC: 9656953. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114582.


Impact of a Rapid Respiratory Pathogen Panel on Antibiotic and Chest Radiography Usage and Hospital Length of Stay in the Pediatric Inpatient Setting.

Schram L, Novak-Weekley S, Chen Q, Han P Perm J. 2022; 26(3):83-89.

PMID: 36001386 PMC: 9683747. DOI: 10.7812/TPP/21.131.


Study of the Etiology of Acute Respiratory Infections in Children Under 5 Years at the Dr. Agostinho Neto Hospital, Praia, Santiago Island, Cabo Verde.

Correia W, Dorta-Guerra R, Sanches M, Almeida Semedo C, Valladares B, de Pina-Araujo I Front Pediatr. 2021; 9:716351.

PMID: 34650939 PMC: 8505963. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.716351.


References
1.
Frayha H, Castriciano S, Mahony J, Chernesky M . Nasopharyngeal swabs and nasopharyngeal aspirates equally effective for the diagnosis of viral respiratory disease in hospitalized children. J Clin Microbiol. 1989; 27(6):1387-9. PMC: 267564. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1387-1389.1989. View

2.
Xu M, Qin X, Astion M, Rutledge J, Simpson J, Jerome K . Implementation of filmarray respiratory viral panel in a core laboratory improves testing turnaround time and patient care. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012; 139(1):118-23. PMC: 7110182. DOI: 10.1309/AJCPH7X3NLYZPHBW. View

3.
Stroparo E, Cruz C, Debur M, Vidal L, Nogueira M, de Almeida S . Adenovirus respiratory infection: significant increase in diagnosis using PCR comparing with antigen detection and culture methods. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2011; 52(6):317-21. DOI: 10.1590/s0036-46652010000600006. View

4.
Hammond S, Gagne L, Stock S, Marty F, Gelman R, Marasco W . Respiratory virus detection in immunocompromised patients with FilmArray respiratory panel compared to conventional methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50(10):3216-21. PMC: 3457462. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00538-12. View

5.
Marcone D, Ricarte C, Videla C, Ekstrom J, Carballal G, Vidaurreta S . [Rhinoviruses. Frequency in nonhospitalized children with acute respiratory infection]. Medicina (B Aires). 2012; 72(1):28-32. View