» Articles » PMID: 25728002

Specification of the Somatic Musculature in Drosophila

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2015 Mar 3
PMID 25728002
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The somatic muscle system formed during Drosophila embryogenesis is required for larvae to hatch, feed, and crawl. This system is replaced in the pupa by a new adult muscle set, responsible for activities such as feeding, walking, and flight. Both the larval and adult muscle systems are comprised of distinct muscle fibers to serve these specific motor functions. In this way, the Drosophila musculature is a valuable model for patterning within a single tissue: while all muscle cells share properties such as the contractile apparatus, properties such as size, position, and number of nuclei are unique for a particular muscle. In the embryo, diversification of muscle fibers relies first on signaling cascades that pattern the mesoderm. Subsequently, the combinatorial expression of specific transcription factors leads muscle fibers to adopt particular sizes, shapes, and orientations. Adult muscle precursors (AMPs), set aside during embryonic development, proliferate during the larval phases and seed the formation of the abdominal, leg, and flight muscles in the adult fly. Adult muscle fibers may either be formed de novo from the fusion of the AMPs, or are created by the binding of AMPs to an existing larval muscle. While less is known about adult muscle specification compared to the larva, expression of specific transcription factors is also important for its diversification. Increasingly, the mechanisms required for the diversification of fly muscle have found parallels in vertebrate systems and mark Drosophila as a robust model system to examine questions about how diverse cell types are generated within an organism.

Citing Articles

Insights and perspectives on the enigmatic alary muscles of arthropods.

Bataille L, Lebreton G, Boukhatmi H, Vincent A Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 11:1337708.

PMID: 38288343 PMC: 10822924. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1337708.


Candidate Regulatory Genes for Hindlimb Development in the Embryos of the Chinese Alligator ().

Yang L, Liu M, Zhu Y, Li Y, Pan T, Li E Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(19).

PMID: 37835732 PMC: 10571561. DOI: 10.3390/ani13193126.


Developmental origin of tendon diversity in .

Moucaud B, Prince E, Jagla K, Soler C Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1176148.

PMID: 37143929 PMC: 10151533. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1176148.


Taking flight: an educational primer for use with "A novel mechanism for activation of myosin regulatory light chain by protein kinase C-delta in Drosophila".

Nowak S, Dobi K Genetics. 2022; 220(3).

PMID: 35239966 PMC: 8893254. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyab187.


: A Model System to Study Distinct Genetic Programs in Myoblast Fusion.

Rout P, Preussner M, Onel S Cells. 2022; 11(3).

PMID: 35159130 PMC: 8834112. DOI: 10.3390/cells11030321.


References
1.
Ghazi A, Anant S, VijayRaghavan K . Apterous mediates development of direct flight muscles autonomously and indirect flight muscles through epidermal cues. Development. 2000; 127(24):5309-18. DOI: 10.1242/dev.127.24.5309. View

2.
Skeath J, CARROLL S . The achaete-scute complex: generation of cellular pattern and fate within the Drosophila nervous system. FASEB J. 1994; 8(10):714-21. DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.8.10.8050670. View

3.
Skeath J . At the nexus between pattern formation and cell-type specification: the generation of individual neuroblast fates in the Drosophila embryonic central nervous system. Bioessays. 1999; 21(11):922-31. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199911)21:11<922::AID-BIES4>3.0.CO;2-T. View

4.
Deng H, Hughes S, Bell J, Simmonds A . Alternative requirements for Vestigial, Scalloped, and Dmef2 during muscle differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Cell. 2008; 20(1):256-69. PMC: 2613084. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e08-03-0288. View

5.
Duan H, Skeath J, Nguyen H . Drosophila Lame duck, a novel member of the Gli superfamily, acts as a key regulator of myogenesis by controlling fusion-competent myoblast development. Development. 2001; 128(22):4489-500. DOI: 10.1242/dev.128.22.4489. View