» Articles » PMID: 25710944

Does Temporary Socket Removal Affect Residual Limb Fluid Volume of Trans-tibial Amputees?

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Date 2015 Feb 25
PMID 25710944
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Lower-limb prosthesis users typically experience residual limb volume losses over the course of the day that can detrimentally affect socket fit.

Objectives: To determine whether temporarily doffing the prosthesis encouraged residual limb fluid volume recovery and whether the recovered fluid was maintained.

Study Design: Experimental design.

Methods: Residual limb fluid volume was monitored on 16 participants in three test sessions each. Participants conducted six cycles of resting/standing/walking. Between the third and fourth cycles, participants sat for 30 min with the prosthesis and liner: donned (ON), the prosthesis doffed but the liner donned (LINER), or the prosthesis and liner doffed (OFF).

Results: Percentage fluid volume gain and retention were greatest for the OFF condition followed by the LINER condition. Participants experienced fluid volume losses for the ON condition.

Conclusion: Doffing the prosthesis or both the prosthesis and liner during rest improved residual limb fluid volume retention compared with leaving the prosthesis and liner donned.

Clinical Relevance: Practitioners should advise patients who undergo high daily limb volume losses to consider temporarily doffing their prosthesis. Fluid volume retention during subsequent activity will be highest if both the prosthesis and liner are doffed.

Citing Articles

An adaptive prosthetic socket for people with transtibial amputation.

Sanders J, Vamos A, Mertens J, Allyn K, Larsen B, Ballesteros D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):11168.

PMID: 38750086 PMC: 11096356. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61234-9.


Beyond step counts: Including wear time in prosthesis use assessment for lower-limb amputation.

DeGrasse N, Mertens J, Brzostowski J, Allyn K, Vamos A, Krout A J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2023; 10:20556683231163337.

PMID: 36935866 PMC: 10021104. DOI: 10.1177/20556683231163337.


A novel portable sensor to monitor bodily positions and activities in transtibial prosthesis users.

Mertens J, Brzostowski J, Vamos A, Allyn K, Hafner B, Friedly J Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2022; 99:105741.

PMID: 36041309 PMC: 10545288. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105741.


Performance of an auto-adjusting prosthetic socket during walking with intermittent socket release.

Weathersby E, Vamos A, Larsen B, McLean J, Carter R, Allyn K J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2022; 9:20556683221093271.

PMID: 35558157 PMC: 9087223. DOI: 10.1177/20556683221093271.


A Novel Method for Assessing Prosthesis Use and Accommodation Practices of People with Transtibial Amputation.

Sanders J, Redd C, Larsen B, Vamos A, Brzostowski J, Hafner B J Prosthet Orthot. 2020; 30(4):214-230.

PMID: 32577075 PMC: 7311105. DOI: 10.1097/jpo.0000000000000209.


References
1.
Sanders J, Greve J, Clinton C, Hafner B . Changes in interface pressure and stump shape over time: preliminary results from a trans-tibial amputee subject. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2000; 24(2):163-8. DOI: 10.1080/03093640008726539. View

2.
Sanders J, Cagle J, Harrison D, Myers T, Allyn K . How does adding and removing liquid from socket bladders affect residual-limb fluid volume?. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013; 50(6):845-60. PMC: 4431595. DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.06.0121. View

3.
Sangeorzan B, Harrington R, Wyss C, Czerniecki J, Matsen 3rd F . Circulatory and mechanical response of skin to loading. J Orthop Res. 1989; 7(3):425-31. DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100070315. View

4.
Sanders J, Harrison D, Cagle J, Myers T, Ciol M, Allyn K . Post-doffing residual limb fluid volume change in people with trans-tibial amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012; 36(4):443-9. PMC: 4423811. DOI: 10.1177/0309364612444752. View

5.
Sanders J, Allyn K, Harrison D, Myers T, Ciol M, Tsai E . Preliminary investigation of residual-limb fluid volume changes within one day. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013; 49(10):1467-78. PMC: 4423818. DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2011.12.0236. View