» Articles » PMID: 36041309

A Novel Portable Sensor to Monitor Bodily Positions and Activities in Transtibial Prosthesis Users

Abstract

Background: Step activity monitors provide insight into the amount of physical activity prosthesis users conduct but not how they use their prosthesis. The purpose of this research was to help fill this void by developing and testing a technology to monitor bodily position and type of activity.

Methods: Thin inductive distance sensors were adhered to the insides of sockets of a small group of transtibial prosthesis users, two at proximal locations and two at distal locations. An in-lab structured protocol and a semi-structured out-of-lab protocol were video recorded, and then participants wore the sensing system for up to 7 days. A data processing algorithm was developed to identify sit, seated shift, stand, standing weight-shift, walk, partial doff, and non-use. Sensed distance data from the structured and semi-structured protocols were compared against the video data to characterize accuracy. Bodily positions and activities during take-home testing were tabulated to characterize participants' use of the prosthesis.

Findings: Sit and walk detection accuracies were above 95% for all four participants tested. Stand detection accuracy was above 90% for three participants and 62.5% for one participant. The reduced accuracy may have been due to limited stand data from that participant. Step count was not proportional to active use time (sum of stand, walk, and standing weight-shift times).

Interpretation: Step count may provide an incomplete picture of prosthesis use. Larger studies should be pursued to investigate how bodily position and type of activity may facilitate clinical decision-making and improve the lives of people with lower limb amputation.

Citing Articles

An adaptive prosthetic socket for people with transtibial amputation.

Sanders J, Vamos A, Mertens J, Allyn K, Larsen B, Ballesteros D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):11168.

PMID: 38750086 PMC: 11096356. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61234-9.


Distal weight bearing in transtibial prosthesis users wearing pin suspension.

Krout A, Weissinger M, Mertens J, Allyn K, Larsen B, McCarthy N Front Rehabil Sci. 2024; 4:1322202.

PMID: 38192637 PMC: 10773776. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1322202.


Beyond step counts: Including wear time in prosthesis use assessment for lower-limb amputation.

DeGrasse N, Mertens J, Brzostowski J, Allyn K, Vamos A, Krout A J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2023; 10:20556683231163337.

PMID: 36935866 PMC: 10021104. DOI: 10.1177/20556683231163337.

References
1.
Sanders J, Cagle J, Allyn K, Harrison D, Ciol M . How do walking, standing, and resting influence transtibial amputee residual limb fluid volume?. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014; 51(2):201-12. PMC: 4435803. DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.04.0085. View

2.
Swanson E, McLean J, Allyn K, Redd C, Sanders J . Instrumented socket inserts for sensing interaction at the limb-socket interface. Med Eng Phys. 2017; 51:111-118. PMC: 5748260. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.11.006. View

3.
Wurdeman S, Schmid K, Myers S, Jacobsen A, Stergiou N . Step Activity and 6-Minute Walk Test Outcomes When Wearing Low-Activity or High-Activity Prosthetic Feet. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016; 96(5):294-300. PMC: 5332338. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000607. View

4.
Chadwell A, Diment L, Mico-Amigo M, Morgado Ramirez D, Dickinson A, Granat M . Technology for monitoring everyday prosthesis use: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020; 17(1):93. PMC: 7362458. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-00711-4. View

5.
Carter R, Larsen B, McLean J, Garbini J, Sanders J . Incorporating a Ferrous Polymer Target into Elastomeric Liners for Socket Fit Sensing in Prosthesis Users. Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(19). PMC: 7582797. DOI: 10.3390/s20195620. View