» Articles » PMID: 23516051

Preliminary Investigation of Residual-limb Fluid Volume Changes Within One Day

Overview
Date 2013 Mar 22
PMID 23516051
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this research was to investigate rates of residual-limb fluid volume change within one day for people with transtibial limb loss. Rates of fluid volume change during 30 min test sessions of sitting, standing, and walking activities were measured twice a day, once in the morning and once in the afternoon, on 12 regular prosthesis users with the use of bioimpedance analysis. Between test sessions, all subjects consumed food and drink, and subject activity ranged from low to high. The rate of fluid volume change within sessions ranged from -8.5 to 5.9 %/h (median: -2.2%/h). The rate of fluid volume change between sessions ranged from -2.7 to 0.9 %/h (median: -1.0%/h). The between-session rate of fluid volume change correlated highly with afternoon within-session rates of change (r = 0.9) but was not well correlated with morning within-session rates of change (r = 0.8). Subjects with peripheral arterial complications showed greater fluid volume loss rates during test sessions than between sessions. Rate of fluid volume change may be affected by sitting, standing, and walking activities; presence of peripheral arterial complications; being female; time since amputation; and wearing the socket without doffing for extended periods.

Citing Articles

An adaptive prosthetic socket for people with transtibial amputation.

Sanders J, Vamos A, Mertens J, Allyn K, Larsen B, Ballesteros D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):11168.

PMID: 38750086 PMC: 11096356. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61234-9.


Temporal and spatial characteristics of bone conduction as non-invasive haptic sensory feedback for upper-limb prosthesis.

Mayer R, Mohammadi A, Tan Y, Alici G, Choong P, Oetomo D Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1113009.

PMID: 37056306 PMC: 10086128. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1113009.


Volume Fluctuations in Active and Nonactive Transtibial Prosthetics Users.

Hamzah N, Abd Razak N, Karim M, Salleh S Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:2669484.

PMID: 36132074 PMC: 9484881. DOI: 10.1155/2022/2669484.


Developing a control framework for self-adjusting prosthetic sockets incorporating tissue injury risk estimation and generalized predictive control.

Mbithi F, Chipperfield A, Steer J, Dickinson A Biomed Eng Lett. 2022; 12(1):59-73.

PMID: 35186360 PMC: 8825909. DOI: 10.1007/s13534-021-00211-x.


Measurements of Best, Worst, and Average Socket Comfort Are More Reliable Than Current Socket Comfort in Established Lower Limb Prosthesis Users.

Morgan S, Askew R, Hafner B Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021; 103(6):1201-1204.

PMID: 34748757 PMC: 9072595. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.10.008.


References
1.
Sanders J, Harrison D, Allyn K, Myers T . Clinical utility of in-socket residual limb volume change measurement: case study results. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009; 33(4):378-90. PMC: 4435543. DOI: 10.3109/03093640903214067. View

2.
Ludbrook J, Loughlin J . REGULATION OF VOLUME IN POSTARTERIOLAR VESSELS OF THE LOWER LIMB. Am Heart J. 1964; 67:493-507. DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(64)90096-1. View

3.
Adragao T, Pires A, Branco P, Castro R, Oliveira A, Nogueira C . Ankle--brachial index, vascular calcifications and mortality in dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 27(1):318-25. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr233. View

4.
Stick C, Stofen P, WITZLEB E . On physiological edema in man's lower extremity. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1985; 54(4):442-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF02337192. View

5.
Keys A, Fidanza F, KARVONEN M, Kimura N, Taylor H . Indices of relative weight and obesity. J Chronic Dis. 1972; 25(6):329-43. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(72)90027-6. View