» Articles » PMID: 25664263

Tibial Cortical Thickness: A Dependable Tool for Assessing Osteoporosis in the Absence of Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiopmetry

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 Feb 10
PMID 25664263
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objective: Bone mineral density measurements with absorptiometry dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for diagnosing low bone mass and risk for fragility fractures. DXA is not available at every center, and physicians require an alternative method of diagnosis before referring patients. We conducted this study to assess and compare total cortical thickness (TCT) and its relation to the T score by DXA and its correlation-ship in the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Patients And Methods: Total cortical thickness was carried out in 50 Saudi Arabian females ≥ 45 years with DXA scans and 25 patients with age of ≤ 35 years whose radiographs of the upper tibia were available for analysis. Postero-medial cortical thickness of the tibia was measured 13 cm from the joint line and an average was calculated. The average T score of the spine and the hip was taken. A comparison was made between age, T score, and the TCT. Inter cortical distance (ICD) was measured and compared in both groups. Data were analyzed for predictive value for diagnosis of osteopenia and osteoporosis.

Results: There was a significant association between the T score and the TCT and age. As the age advanced the T score and TCT was very low (<0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] <0.2). Forty patients were osteopenic and 10 osteoporotic. The T score in the former was - 1.33 ± 0.71 and the later was - 3.22 ± 0.56 (P < 0.0001 95% CI: <-1.67) and the TCT was 0.655 ± 0.06 versus 0.51 ± 0.05 (P < 0.0001 95% CI: <-0.17). In women ≤35 years the average TCT was 0.804 ± 0.155 cm and IMD was 3.34 ± 0.45 cm.

Conclusions: We conclude that if TCT is less than the threshold value of ≤ 0.5 cm, patients should be referred for further investigations with DXA. We believe that further studies are needed to confirm our findings and in areas where DXA is not available, based on the TCT measurement anti-osteoporotic therapy could be initiated when other risk factors for osteoporosis is present.

Citing Articles

Assessment of the effectiveness and perception of different teaching techniques used in pharmacology among students.

Jaju T, Parmar U, Gajbhiye S, Kurle D, Shah R J Postgrad Med. 2024; 70(4):217-222.

PMID: 39670320 PMC: 11722705. DOI: 10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_44_24.


Sonographic cortical bone thickness measurement: can it predict bone mineral density in the pediatric population?.

Isin U, Cakmakci E, Bulus A, Yasartekin Y, Unal O, Dirican O Diagn Interv Radiol. 2023; 30(3):200-204.

PMID: 38044613 PMC: 11095066. DOI: 10.4274/dir.2023.232392.


The Development and Biomechanical Analysis of an Allograft Interference Screw for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Lifka S, Rehberger Y, Pastl K, Rofner-Moretti A, Reichkendler M, Baumgartner W Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(10).

PMID: 37892904 PMC: 10604633. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10101174.


Variance of radiographical alveolar bone mineral density by the anatomical morphology of mandibular bone.

Katsumata A, Kohinata K, Esaki Y, Kawai M Heliyon. 2022; 8(11):e11507.

PMID: 36419656 PMC: 9676521. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11507.


Evaluation of the tibial cortical thickness accuracy in osteoporosis diagnosis in comparison with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Zadeh A, Hanafi M, Kiasat A, Mousavi M J Family Med Prim Care. 2019; 8(2):523-527.

PMID: 30984666 PMC: 6436287. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_456_18.


References
1.
MORGAN D, SPIERS F, PULVERTAFT C, FOURMAN P . The amount of bone in the metacarpal and the phalanx according to age and sex. Clin Radiol. 1967; 18(1):101-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(67)80137-5. View

2.
Ritzel H, Amling M, Posl M, Hahn M, Delling G . The thickness of human vertebral cortical bone and its changes in aging and osteoporosis: a histomorphometric analysis of the complete spinal column from thirty-seven autopsy specimens. J Bone Miner Res. 1997; 12(1):89-95. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.89. View

3.
Tingart M, Apreleva M, von Stechow D, Zurakowski D, Warner J . The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85(4):611-7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.85b4.12843. View

4.
Barnett E, Nordin B . The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. Clin Radiol. 1960; 11:166-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(60)80012-8. View

5.
Mazess R . Fracture risk: a role for compact bone. Calcif Tissue Int. 1990; 47(4):191-3. DOI: 10.1007/BF02555918. View