» Articles » PMID: 25642295

Associations Between Self-referral and Health Behavior Responses to Genetic Risk Information

Overview
Journal Genome Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Genetics
Date 2015 Feb 3
PMID 25642295
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Studies examining whether genetic risk information about common, complex diseases can motivate individuals to improve health behaviors and advance planning have shown mixed results. Examining the influence of different study recruitment strategies may help reconcile inconsistencies.

Methods: Secondary analyses were conducted on data from the REVEAL study, a series of randomized clinical trials examining the impact of genetic susceptibility testing for Alzheimer's disease (AD). We tested whether self-referred participants (SRPs) were more likely than actively recruited participants (ARPs) to report health behavior and advance planning changes after AD risk and APOE genotype disclosure.

Results: Of 795 participants with known recruitment status, 546 (69%) were self-referred and 249 (31%) had been actively recruited. SRPs were younger, less likely to identify as African American, had higher household incomes, and were more attentive to AD than ARPs (all P < 0.01). They also dropped out of the study before genetic risk disclosure less frequently (26% versus 41%, P < 0.001). Cohorts did not differ in their likelihood of reporting a change to at least one health behavior 6 weeks and 12 months after genetic risk disclosure, nor in intentions to change at least one behavior in the future. However, interaction effects were observed where ε4-positive SRPs were more likely than ε4-negative SRPs to report changes specifically to mental activities (38% vs 19%, p < 0.001) and diets (21% vs 12%, p = 0.016) six weeks post-disclosure, whereas differences between ε4-positive and ε4-negative ARPs were not evident for mental activities (15% vs 21%, p = 0.413) or diets (8% versus 16%, P = 0.190). Similarly, ε4-positive participants were more likely than ε4-negative participants to report intentions to change long-term care insurance among SRPs (20% vs 5%, p < 0.001), but not ARPs (5% versus 9%, P = 0.365).

Conclusions: Individuals who proactively seek AD genetic risk assessment are more likely to undergo testing and use results to inform behavior changes than those who respond to genetic testing offers. These results demonstrate how the behavioral impact of genetic risk information may vary according to the models by which services are provided, and suggest that how participants are recruited into translational genomics research can influence findings.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00089882 and NCT00462917.

Citing Articles

Attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions of patients who received elective genomic testing as a clinical service.

Zoltick E, Bell M, Hickingbotham M, Wu A, Galbraith L, LeBlanc J Genet Med. 2024; 26(10):101200.

PMID: 38943480 PMC: 11456384. DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101200.


Interest in genetic susceptibility testing and disclosure of AD dementia risk in cognitively normal adults: a survey study.

Waterink L, Masselink L, van der Lee S, Visser L, Cleutjens S, Van Der Schaar J Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024; 16(1):1.

PMID: 38167083 PMC: 10759504. DOI: 10.1186/s13195-023-01364-w.


Returning Genetic Information About Risk for Alcohol Use Disorder to Adolescents: Findings of a Preliminary Qualitative Study of Precision Prevention.

Weitzman E, Blakemore L, Pierce S, Kossowsky J, Levy S AJPM Focus. 2023; 3(1):100153.

PMID: 38089426 PMC: 10711383. DOI: 10.1016/j.focus.2023.100153.


Public perspective on medications to delay Alzheimer's disease symptoms.

Rich M, Blout Zawatsky C, Botta J, Christensen K J Genet Couns. 2023; 32(5):1009-1017.

PMID: 37102213 PMC: 10593096. DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1708.


Disclosure of Genetic Risk Factors for Alzheimer's Disease to Cognitively Healthy Individuals-From Current Practice towards a Personalised Medicine Scenario.

Galluzzi S, Pievani M, Zanetti O, Benussi L, The Italian-DIAfN Working Group , Frisoni G Biomedicines. 2022; 10(12).

PMID: 36551936 PMC: 9775740. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123177.


References
1.
Marteau T, French D, Griffin S, Prevost A, Sutton S, Watkinson C . Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (10):CD007275. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007275.pub2. View

2.
Roberts J, Christensen K, Green R . Using Alzheimer's disease as a model for genetic risk disclosure: implications for personal genomics. Clin Genet. 2011; 80(5):407-14. PMC: 3191239. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01739.x. View

3.
Henrikson N, Harris J, Bowen D . Predictors of self-referral into a cancer genetics registry. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; 16(7):1387-92. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0009. View

4.
McBride C, Curry S, Grothaus L, ROSNER D, Louie D, Wagner E . Use of self-help materials and smoking cessation among proactively recruited and volunteer intervention participants. Am J Health Promot. 1998; 12(5):321-4. DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-12.5.321. View

5.
Middleton A, Patch C, Wiggins J, Barnes K, Crawford G, Benjamin C . Position statement on opportunistic genomic screening from the Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors (UK and Ireland). Eur J Hum Genet. 2014; 22(8):955-6. PMC: 4350604. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.301. View