» Articles » PMID: 22498844

Effectiveness of a Condensed Protocol for Disclosing APOE Genotype and Providing Risk Education for Alzheimer Disease

Overview
Journal Genet Med
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Genetics
Date 2012 Apr 14
PMID 22498844
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Brief, effective models of patient genetic education are needed for common, complex diseases. Using Alzheimer disease as a model, we compared participants' risk knowledge and recall in extended versus condensed education protocols.

Methods: A four-site randomized clinical trial enrolled 280 first-degree relatives of individuals with Alzheimer disease (mean age = 58 years, 71% female); each received lifetime Alzheimer disease risk information (range: 13-74%) that incorporated apolipoprotein E genotype. In the condensed protocol, participants received an educational brochure in place of an in-person education session. Outcomes were assessed at 6 weeks and 6 months following risk disclosure.

Results: The condensed protocol required less clinician time than the extended protocol (mean = 34 min vs. 77 min). The groups did not differ on recall of apolipoprotein E genotype or lifetime risk, and most participants in both groups recalled and retained this information over time. Both groups showed improvement from baseline in Alzheimer disease risk knowledge (e.g., understanding the magnitude of apolipoprotein E genotype effect on risk).

Conclusion: A condensed protocol for communicating genetic risk for Alzheimer disease achieved similar educational results as an extended protocol in this study. Further research should explore the efficacy of brief genetic education protocols for complex diseases in diverse populations.

Citing Articles

Return of Results in Genomic Research Using Large-Scale or Whole Genome Sequencing: Toward a New Normal.

Wolf S, Green R Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2023; 24:393-414.

PMID: 36913714 PMC: 10497726. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-101122-103209.


Spillover: The Approval of New Medications for Alzheimer's Disease Dementia Will Impact Biomarker Disclosure Among Asymptomatic Research Participants.

Mozersky J, Roberts J, Rumbaugh M, Chhatwal J, Wijsman E, Galasko D J Alzheimers Dis. 2022; 90(3):1035-1043.

PMID: 35404285 PMC: 9794032. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-220113.


Implementation matters: How patient experiences differ when genetic counseling accompanies the return of genetic variants of uncertain significance.

Patel H, Henrikson N, Ralston J, Leppig K, Scrol A, Jarvik G AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022; 2021:950-958.

PMID: 35309003 PMC: 8861684.


Moving beyond disclosure: Stages of care in preclinical Alzheimer's disease biomarker testing.

Ketchum F, Chin N, Grill J, Gleason C, Erickson C, Clark L Alzheimers Dement. 2022; 18(10):1969-1979.

PMID: 35213786 PMC: 9402800. DOI: 10.1002/alz.12620.


Young people's moral attitudes and motivations towards direct-to-consumer genetic testing for inherited risk of Alzheimer disease.

Pavarini G, Hamdi L, Lorimer J, Singh I Eur J Med Genet. 2021; 64(6):104180.

PMID: 33781925 PMC: 8192412. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2021.104180.


References
1.
Cupples L, Farrer L, Sadovnick A, Relkin N, Whitehouse P, Green R . Estimating risk curves for first-degree relatives of patients with Alzheimer's disease: the REVEAL study. Genet Med. 2004; 6(4):192-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.gim.0000132679.92238.58. View

2.
Graves K, Wenzel L, Schwartz M, Luta G, Wileyto P, Narod S . Randomized controlled trial of a psychosocial telephone counseling intervention in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010; 19(3):648-54. PMC: 2849295. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0548. View

3.
Meiser B, Halliday J . What is the impact of genetic counselling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer? A meta-analytic review. Soc Sci Med. 2002; 54(10):1463-70. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00133-2. View

4.
Julian-Reynier C, Welkenhuysen M, Hagoel L, Decruyenaere M, Hopwood P . Risk communication strategies: state of the art and effectiveness in the context of cancer genetic services. Eur J Hum Genet. 2003; 11(10):725-36. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201037. View

5.
Wolfberg A . Genes on the Web--direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic testing. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(6):543-5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp068079. View