» Articles » PMID: 25637774

The Perirhinal Cortex and Conceptual Processing: Effects of Feature-based Statistics Following Damage to the Anterior Temporal Lobes

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2015 Feb 1
PMID 25637774
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The anterior temporal lobe (ATL) plays a prominent role in models of semantic knowledge, although it remains unclear how the specific subregions within the ATL contribute to semantic memory. Patients with neurodegenerative diseases, like semantic dementia, have widespread damage to the ATL thus making inferences about the relationship between anatomy and cognition problematic. Here we take a detailed anatomical approach to ask which substructures within the ATL contribute to conceptual processing, with the prediction that the perirhinal cortex (PRc) will play a critical role for concepts that are more semantically confusable. We tested two patient groups, those with and without damage to the PRc, across two behavioural experiments - picture naming and word-picture matching. For both tasks, we manipulated the degree of semantic confusability of the concepts. By contrasting the performance of the two groups, along with healthy controls, we show that damage to the PRc results in worse performance in processing concepts with higher semantic confusability across both experiments. Further by correlating the degree of damage across anatomically defined regions of interest with performance, we find that PRc damage is related to performance for concepts with increased semantic confusability. Our results show that the PRc supports a necessary and crucial neurocognitve function that enables fine-grained conceptual processes to take place through the resolution of semantic confusability.

Citing Articles

Representation of event and object concepts in ventral anterior temporal lobe and angular gyrus.

Zhang Y, Wu W, Mirman D, Hoffman P Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(2).

PMID: 38185997 PMC: 10839851. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad519.


Multisensory perception constrains the formation of object categories: a review of evidence from sensory-driven and predictive processes on categorical decisions.

Newell F, McKenna E, Seveso M, Devine I, Alahmad F, Hirst R Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1886):20220342.

PMID: 37545304 PMC: 10404931. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0342.


Sequential involvements of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus in the recall of item-location associative memory in macaques.

Yang C, Naya Y PLoS Biol. 2023; 21(6):e3002145.

PMID: 37289802 PMC: 10284415. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002145.


Proper and common names in the semantic system.

Desai R, Tadimeti U, Riccardi N Brain Struct Funct. 2022; 228(1):239-254.

PMID: 36372812 PMC: 10171918. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-022-02593-9.


Temporopolar regions of the human brain.

Marsel Mesulam M Brain. 2022; 146(1):20-41.

PMID: 36331542 PMC: 10060717. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awac339.


References
1.
Mirman D, Magnuson J . Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008; 34(1):65-79. PMC: 2276160. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.65. View

2.
Gotts S, Plaut D . Connectionist approaches to understanding aphasic perseveration. Semin Speech Lang. 2004; 25(4):323-34. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-837245. View

3.
Clarke A, Taylor K, Devereux B, Randall B, Tyler L . From perception to conception: how meaningful objects are processed over time. Cereb Cortex. 2012; 23(1):187-97. PMC: 3619663. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs002. View

4.
McRae K, de Sa V, Seidenberg M . On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1997; 126(2):99-130. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.126.2.99. View

5.
Rademacher J, Galaburda A, Kennedy D, Filipek P, Caviness Jr V . Human cerebral cortex: localization, parcellation, and morphometry with magnetic resonance imaging. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013; 4(4):352-74. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1992.4.4.352. View