» Articles » PMID: 9950716

Conceptual Processing During the Conscious Resting State. A Functional MRI Study

Overview
Journal J Cogn Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 1999 Feb 9
PMID 9950716
Citations 405
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Localized, task-induced decreases in cerebral blood flow are a frequent finding in functional brain imaging research but remain poorly understood. One account of these phenomena postulates processes ongoing during conscious, resting states that are interrupted or inhibited by task performance. Psychological evidence suggests that conscious humans are engaged almost continuously in adaptive processes involving semantic knowledge retrieval, representation in awareness, and directed manipulation of represented knowledge for organization, problem-solving, and planning. If interruption of such 'conceptual' processes accounts for task-induced deactivation, tasks that also engage these conceptual processes should not cause deactivation. Furthermore, comparisons between conceptual and nonconceptual tasks should show activation during conceptual tasks of the same brain areas that are 'deactivated' relative to rest. To test this model, functional magnetic resonance imaging data were acquired during a resting state, a perceptual task, and a semantic retrieval task. A network of left-hemisphere polymodal cortical regions showed higher signal values during the resting state than during the perceptual task but equal values during the resting and semantic conditions. This result is consistent with the proposal that perceptual tasks interrupt processes ongoing during rest that involve many of the same brain areas engaged during semantic retrieval. As further evidence for this model, the same network of brain areas was activated in two direct comparisons between semantic and perceptual processing tasks. This same 'conceptual processing' network was also identified in several previous studies that contrasted semantic and perceptual tasks or resting and active states. The model proposed here offers a unified account of these findings and may help to explain several unanticipated results from prior studies of semantic processing.

Citing Articles

When abstract becomes concrete, naturalistic encoding of concepts in the brain.

Kewenig V, Vigliocco G, Skipper J Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39636743 PMC: 11620750. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.91522.


Changes in Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Default Network Oscillations between 19 and 29 Years of Age.

Fehr T, Mehrens S, Haag M, Amelung A, Gloy K Brain Sci. 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39061412 PMC: 11274777. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14070671.


Resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) microstates of healthy individuals following mild sleep deprivation.

Khoo S, Lai W, On S, On Y, Adam B, Law W Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16820.

PMID: 39039219 PMC: 11263689. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67902-0.


Why do we think? The dynamics of spontaneous thought reveal its functions.

Mildner J, Tamir D PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(6):pgae230.

PMID: 38939015 PMC: 11210302. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae230.


The primacy of experience in language processing: Semantic priming is driven primarily by experiential similarity.

Fernandino L, Conant L Neuropsychologia. 2024; 201:108939.

PMID: 38897450 PMC: 11326522. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108939.