» Articles » PMID: 25624482

Intrinsic Biocontainment: Multiplex Genome Safeguards Combine Transcriptional and Recombinational Control of Essential Yeast Genes

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2015 Jan 28
PMID 25624482
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Biocontainment may be required in a wide variety of situations such as work with pathogens, field release applications of engineered organisms, and protection of intellectual properties. Here, we describe the control of growth of the brewer's yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, using both transcriptional and recombinational "safeguard" control of essential gene function. Practical biocontainment strategies dependent on the presence of small molecules require them to be active at very low concentrations, rendering them inexpensive and difficult to detect. Histone genes were controlled by an inducible promoter and controlled by 30 nM estradiol. The stability of the engineered genes was separately regulated by the expression of a site-specific recombinase. The combined frequency of generating viable derivatives when both systems were active was below detection (<10(-10)), consistent with their orthogonal nature and the individual escape frequencies of <10(-6). Evaluation of escaper mutants suggests strategies for reducing their emergence. Transcript profiling and growth test suggest high fitness of safeguarded strains, an important characteristic for wide acceptance.

Citing Articles

Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for medical applications.

Maneira C, Chamas A, Lackner G Microb Cell Fact. 2025; 24(1):12.

PMID: 39789534 PMC: 11720383. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-024-02625-5.


Quadruplet codon decoding-based versatile genetic biocontainment system.

Choi Y, Kim D, Lee S, Shin Y, Lee J Nucleic Acids Res. 2025; 53(1.

PMID: 39777466 PMC: 11705086. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae1292.


GenoMine: a CRISPR-Cas9-based kill switch for biocontainment of .

Asin-Garcia E, Martin-Pascual M, de Buck C, Allewijn M, Muller A, Martins Dos Santos V Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1426107.

PMID: 39351062 PMC: 11439788. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1426107.


A Methodology for the Assessment and Prioritization of Genetic Biocontainment Technologies for Engineered Microbes.

Payne S, Wick S, Carr P, Guido N Appl Biosaf. 2024; 29(2):108-119.

PMID: 39144101 PMC: 11319856. DOI: 10.1089/apb.2023.0025.


Engineering stringent genetic biocontainment of yeast with a protein stability switch.

Hoffmann S, Cai Y Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):1060.

PMID: 38316765 PMC: 10844650. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-44988-8.


References
1.
Czar M, Cai Y, Peccoud J . Writing DNA with GenoCAD. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37(Web Server issue):W40-7. PMC: 2703884. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp361. View

2.
Hillson N, Rosengarten R, Keasling J . j5 DNA assembly design automation software. ACS Synth Biol. 2013; 1(1):14-21. DOI: 10.1021/sb2000116. View

3.
Anders S, Pyl P, Huber W . HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 31(2):166-9. PMC: 4287950. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. View

4.
Dymond J, Richardson S, Coombes C, Babatz T, Muller H, Annaluru N . Synthetic chromosome arms function in yeast and generate phenotypic diversity by design. Nature. 2011; 477(7365):471-6. PMC: 3774833. DOI: 10.1038/nature10403. View

5.
Wang H, Isaacs F, Carr P, Sun Z, Xu G, Forest C . Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution. Nature. 2009; 460(7257):894-898. PMC: 4590770. DOI: 10.1038/nature08187. View