» Articles » PMID: 25578907

The Value of the Follow-through Derives from Motor Learning Depending on Future Actions

Overview
Journal Curr Biol
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biology
Date 2015 Jan 13
PMID 25578907
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In ball sports, we are taught to follow through, despite the inability of events after contact or release to influence the outcome [1, 2]. Here we show that the specific motor memory active at any given moment critically depends on the movement that will be made in the near future. We demonstrate that associating a different follow-through movement with two motor skills that normally interfere [3-7] allows them to be learned simultaneously, suggesting that distinct future actions activate separate motor memories. This implies that when learning a skill, a variable follow-through would activate multiple motor memories across practice, whereas a consistent follow-through would activate a single motor memory, resulting in faster learning. We confirm this prediction and show that such follow-through effects influence adaptation over time periods associated with real-world skill learning. Overall, our results indicate that movements made in the immediate future influence the current active motor memory. This suggests that there is a critical time period both before [8] and after the current movement that determines motor memory activation and controls learning.

Citing Articles

The cerebellum acts as the analog to the medial temporal lobe for sensorimotor memory.

Hadjiosif A, Gibo T, Smith M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(42):e2411459121.

PMID: 39374383 PMC: 11494333. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2411459121.


Kernels of Motor Memory Formation: Temporal Generalization in Bimanual Adaptation.

Howard I, Franklin S, Franklin D J Neurosci. 2024; 44(47).

PMID: 39358042 PMC: 11580777. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0359-24.2024.


Attention defines the context for implicit sensorimotor adaptation.

Wang T, Li J, Ivry R bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39282258 PMC: 11398353. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.03.611108.


Future movement plans interact in sequential arm movements.

Kashefi M, Reschechtko S, Ariani G, Shahbazi M, Tan A, Diedrichsen J Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39219499 PMC: 11368400. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.94485.


Designing and Analyzing In-Place Motor Tasks in Virtual Reality With Goal Functions.

Carrera R, Tao C, Agrawal S IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2024; 32:2928-2938.

PMID: 39106130 PMC: 11492765. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3439500.


References
1.
Nozaki D, Kurtzer I, Scott S . Limited transfer of learning between unimanual and bimanual skills within the same limb. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 9(11):1364-6. DOI: 10.1038/nn1785. View

2.
Churchland M, Afshar A, Shenoy K . A central source of movement variability. Neuron. 2006; 52(6):1085-96. PMC: 1941679. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.10.034. View

3.
Emken J, Benitez R, Sideris A, Bobrow J, Reinkensmeyer D . Motor adaptation as a greedy optimization of error and effort. J Neurophysiol. 2007; 97(6):3997-4006. DOI: 10.1152/jn.01095.2006. View

4.
Imamizu H, Sugimoto N, Osu R, Tsutsui K, Sugiyama K, Wada Y . Explicit contextual information selectively contributes to predictive switching of internal models. Exp Brain Res. 2007; 181(3):395-408. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0940-1. View

5.
van Beers R . Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise. Neuron. 2009; 63(3):406-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.025. View