» Articles » PMID: 17178410

A Central Source of Movement Variability

Overview
Journal Neuron
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Neurology
Date 2006 Dec 21
PMID 17178410
Citations 196
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Movements are universally, sometimes frustratingly, variable. When such variability causes error, we typically assume that something went wrong during the movement. The same assumption is made by recent and influential models of motor control. These posit that the principal limit on repeatable performance is neuromuscular noise that corrupts movement as it occurs. An alternative hypothesis is that movement variability arises before movements begin, during motor preparation. We examined this possibility directly by recording the preparatory activity of single cortical neurons during a highly practiced reach task. Small variations in preparatory neural activity were predictive of small variations in the upcoming reach. Effect magnitudes were such that at least half of the observed movement variability likely had its source during motor preparation. Thus, even for a highly practiced task, the ability to repeatedly plan the same movement limits our ability to repeatedly execute the same movement.

Citing Articles

The polarity of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation affects the planning and execution of movement sequences.

Son J, Erker T, Ward T, Arif Y, Huang P, John J Neuroimage. 2025; 306:121018.

PMID: 39800171 PMC: 11829609. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121018.


Preconfigured cortico-thalamic neural dynamics constrain movement-associated thalamic activity.

Gonzalez-Pereyra P, Sanchez-Lobato O, Martinez-Montalvo M, Ortega-Romero D, Perez-Diaz C, Merchant H Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10185.

PMID: 39582075 PMC: 11586408. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54742-9.


Roles and interplay of reinforcement-based and error-based processes during reaching and gait in neurotypical adults and individuals with Parkinson's disease.

Roth A, Buggeln J, Hoh J, Wood J, Sullivan S, Ngo T PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(10):e1012474.

PMID: 39401183 PMC: 11472932. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012474.


A neural basis of choking under pressure.

Smoulder A, Marino P, Oby E, Snyder S, Miyata H, Pavlovsky N Neuron. 2024; 112(20):3424-3433.e8.

PMID: 39270654 PMC: 11791831. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.08.012.


Context-dependence of deterministic and nondeterministic contributions to closed-loop steering control.

Egger S, Keemink S, Goldman M, Britten K bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39131368 PMC: 11312469. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.26.605325.


References
1.
Iguchi N, Sakaguchi Y, Ishida F . The minimum endpoint variance trajectory depends on the profile of the signal-dependent noise. Biol Cybern. 2005; 92(4):219-28. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-005-0541-7. View

2.
Osborne L, Lisberger S, Bialek W . A sensory source for motor variation. Nature. 2005; 437(7057):412-6. PMC: 2551316. DOI: 10.1038/nature03961. View

3.
Haruno M, Wolpert D . Optimal control of redundant muscles in step-tracking wrist movements. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 94(6):4244-55. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00404.2005. View

4.
Sosnoff J, Valantine A, Newell K . Independence between the amount and structure of variability at low force levels. Neurosci Lett. 2005; 392(3):165-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.09.010. View

5.
Churchland M, Yu B, Ryu S, Santhanam G, Shenoy K . Neural variability in premotor cortex provides a signature of motor preparation. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(14):3697-712. PMC: 6674116. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3762-05.2006. View