» Articles » PMID: 25558350

Copy Number Variation Analysis Based on AluScan Sequences

Abstract

Background: AluScan combines inter-Alu PCR using multiple Alu-based primers with opposite orientations and next-generation sequencing to capture a huge number of Alu-proximal genomic sequences for investigation. Its requirement of only sub-microgram quantities of DNA facilitates the examination of large numbers of samples. However, the special features of AluScan data rendered difficult the calling of copy number variation (CNV) directly using the calling algorithms designed for whole genome sequencing (WGS) or exome sequencing.

Results: In this study, an AluScanCNV package has been assembled for efficient CNV calling from AluScan sequencing data employing a Geary-Hinkley transformation (GHT) of read-depth ratios between either paired test-control samples, or between test samples and a reference template constructed from reference samples, to call the localized CNVs, followed by use of a GISTIC-like algorithm to identify recurrent CNVs and circular binary segmentation (CBS) to reveal large extended CNVs. To evaluate the utility of CNVs called from AluScan data, the AluScans from 23 non-cancer and 38 cancer genomes were analyzed in this study. The glioma samples analyzed yielded the familiar extended copy-number losses on chromosomes 1p and 9. Also, the recurrent somatic CNVs identified from liver cancer samples were similar to those reported for liver cancer WGS with respect to a striking enrichment of copy-number gains in chromosomes 1q and 8q. When localized or recurrent CNV-features capable of distinguishing between liver and non-liver cancer samples were selected by correlation-based machine learning, a highly accurate separation of the liver and non-liver cancer classes was attained.

Conclusions: The results obtained from non-cancer and cancerous tissues indicated that the AluScanCNV package can be employed to call localized, recurrent and extended CNVs from AluScan sequences. Moreover, both the localized and recurrent CNVs identified by this method could be subjected to machine-learning selection to yield distinguishing CNV-features that were capable of separating between liver cancers and other types of cancers. Since the method is applicable to any human DNA sample with or without the availability of a paired control, it can also be employed to analyze the constitutional CNVs of individuals.

Citing Articles

Genomic subtyping of liver cancers with prognostic application.

Wu Z, Long X, Tsang S, Hu T, Yang J, Mat W BMC Cancer. 2020; 20(1):84.

PMID: 32005109 PMC: 6995214. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-6546-8.


AluScanCNV2: An R package for copy number variation calling and cancer risk prediction with next-generation sequencing data.

Hu T, Chen S, Ullah A, Xue H Genes Dis. 2019; 6(1):43-46.

PMID: 30906832 PMC: 6411622. DOI: 10.1016/j.gendis.2018.09.001.


Forward and reverse mutations in stages of cancer development.

Hu T, Kumar Y, Shazia I, Duan S, Li Y, Chen L Hum Genomics. 2018; 12(1):40.

PMID: 30134973 PMC: 6104001. DOI: 10.1186/s40246-018-0170-6.


Feature co-localization landscape of the human genome.

Ng S, Hu T, Long X, Chan C, Tsang S, Xue H Sci Rep. 2016; 6:20650.

PMID: 26854351 PMC: 4745063. DOI: 10.1038/srep20650.


Massive interstitial copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity as evidence for cancer being a disease of the DNA-damage response.

Kumar Y, Yang J, Hu T, Chen L, Xu Z, Xu L BMC Med Genomics. 2015; 8:42.

PMID: 26208496 PMC: 4515014. DOI: 10.1186/s12920-015-0104-2.

References
1.
Teo S, Pawitan Y, Ku C, Chia K, Salim A . Statistical challenges associated with detecting copy number variations with next-generation sequencing. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(21):2711-8. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts535. View

2.
Boeva V, Popova T, Bleakley K, Chiche P, Cappo J, Schleiermacher G . Control-FREEC: a tool for assessing copy number and allelic content using next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2011; 28(3):423-5. PMC: 3268243. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr670. View

3.
Krepischi A, Pearson P, Rosenberg C . Germline copy number variations and cancer predisposition. Future Oncol. 2012; 8(4):441-50. DOI: 10.2217/fon.12.34. View

4.
Sathirapongsasuti J, Lee H, Horst B, Brunner G, Cochran A, Binder S . Exome sequencing-based copy-number variation and loss of heterozygosity detection: ExomeCNV. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27(19):2648-54. PMC: 3179661. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr462. View

5.
Pinkel D, Albertson D . Array comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in cancer. Nat Genet. 2005; 37 Suppl:S11-7. DOI: 10.1038/ng1569. View