» Articles » PMID: 23527109

Comparative Studies of Copy Number Variation Detection Methods for Next-generation Sequencing Technologies

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Mar 26
PMID 23527109
Citations 76
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Copy number variation (CNV) has played an important role in studies of susceptibility or resistance to complex diseases. Traditional methods such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) suffer from low resolution of genomic regions. Following the emergence of next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, CNV detection methods based on the short read data have recently been developed. However, due to the relatively young age of the procedures, their performance is not fully understood. To help investigators choose suitable methods to detect CNVs, comparative studies are needed. We compared six publicly available CNV detection methods: CNV-seq, FREEC, readDepth, CNVnator, SegSeq and event-wise testing (EWT). They are evaluated both on simulated and real data with different experiment settings. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is employed to demonstrate the detection performance in terms of sensitivity and specificity, box plot is employed to compare their performances in terms of breakpoint and copy number estimation, Venn diagram is employed to show the consistency among these methods, and F-score is employed to show the overlapping quality of detected CNVs. The computational demands are also studied. The results of our work provide a comprehensive evaluation on the performances of the selected CNV detection methods, which will help biological investigators choose the best possible method.

Citing Articles

Advancing pathogen and tumor copy number variation detection through simultaneous metagenomic next-generation sequencing: A comprehensive review.

Xie X, Xi X, Zhao D, Zhao Y, Yi T, Chen D Heliyon. 2024; 10(21):e38826.

PMID: 39568836 PMC: 11577201. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38826.


LoRA-TV: read depth profile-based clustering of tumor cells in single-cell sequencing.

Duan J, Zhao X, Wu X Brief Bioinform. 2024; 25(4).

PMID: 38877886 PMC: 11179121. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbae277.


Genetic Testing for Global Developmental Delay in Early Childhood.

Zhang J, Xu Y, Liu Y, Yue L, Jin H, Chen Y JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(6):e2415084.

PMID: 38837156 PMC: 11154162. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15084.


Identification of necroptosis-related gene signatures for predicting the prognosis of ovarian cancer.

Qin Y, Sheng Y, Ren M, Hou Z, Xiao L, Chen R Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):11133.

PMID: 38750159 PMC: 11096311. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61849-y.


Unravelling the Genetic Landscape of Hemiplegic Migraine: Exploring Innovative Strategies and Emerging Approaches.

Alfayyadh M, Maksemous N, Sutherland H, Lea R, Griffiths L Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(4).

PMID: 38674378 PMC: 11049430. DOI: 10.3390/genes15040443.


References
1.
Zou H, Li R . One-step Sparse Estimates in Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood Models. Ann Stat. 2009; 36(4):1509-1533. PMC: 2759727. DOI: 10.1214/009053607000000802. View

2.
Chiang D, Getz G, Jaffe D, OKelly M, Zhao X, Carter S . High-resolution mapping of copy-number alterations with massively parallel sequencing. Nat Methods. 2008; 6(1):99-103. PMC: 2630795. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1276. View

3.
Simpson J, McIntyre R, Adams D, Durbin R . Copy number variant detection in inbred strains from short read sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2009; 26(4):565-7. PMC: 2820678. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp693. View

4.
Peltonen L, Altshuler D, de Bakker P, Deloukas P, Gabriel S, Gwilliam R . Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations. Nature. 2010; 467(7311):52-8. PMC: 3173859. DOI: 10.1038/nature09298. View

5.
Yoon S, Xuan Z, Makarov V, Ye K, Sebat J . Sensitive and accurate detection of copy number variants using read depth of coverage. Genome Res. 2009; 19(9):1586-92. PMC: 2752127. DOI: 10.1101/gr.092981.109. View