» Articles » PMID: 25510656

Rapid Generation of Clinical-grade Antiviral T Cells: Selection of Suitable T-cell Donors and GMP-compliant Manufacturing of Antiviral T Cells

Abstract

Background: The adoptive transfer of allogeneic antiviral T lymphocytes derived from seropositive donors can safely and effectively reduce or prevent the clinical manifestation of viral infections or reactivations in immunocompromised recipients after hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT) or solid organ transplantation (SOT). Allogeneic third party T-cell donors offer an alternative option for patients receiving an allogeneic cord blood transplant or a transplant from a virus-seronegative donor and since donor blood is generally not available for solid organ recipients. Therefore we established a registry of potential third-party T-cell donors (allogeneic cell registry, alloCELL) providing detailed data on the assessment of a specific individual memory T-cell repertoire in response to antigens of cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), adenovirus (ADV), and human herpesvirus (HHV) 6.

Methods: To obtain a manufacturing license according to the German Medicinal Products Act, the enrichment of clinical-grade CMV-specific T cells from three healthy CMV-seropositive donors was performed aseptically under GMP conditions using the CliniMACS cytokine capture system (CCS) after restimulation with an overlapping peptide pool of the immunodominant CMVpp65 antigen. Potential T-cell donors were selected from alloCELL and defined as eligible for clinical-grade antiviral T-cell generation if the peripheral fraction of IFN-γ(+) T cells exceeded 0.03% of CD3(+) lymphocytes as determined by IFN-γ cytokine secretion assay.

Results: Starting with low concentration of IFN-γ(+) T cells (0.07-1.11%) we achieved 81.2%, 19.2%, and 63.1% IFN-γ(+)CD3(+) T cells (1.42 × 10(6), 0.05 × 10(6), and 1.15 × 10(6)) after enrichment. Using the CMVpp65 peptide pool for restimulation resulted in the activation of more CMV-specific CD8(+) than CD4(+) memory T cells, both of which were effectively enriched to a total of 81.0% CD8(+)IFN-γ(+) and 38.4% CD4(+)IFN-γ(+) T cells. In addition to T cells and NKT cells, all preparations contained acceptably low percentages of contaminating B cells, granulocytes, monocytes, and NK cells. The enriched T-cell products were stable over 72 h with respect to viability and ratio of T lymphocytes.

Conclusions: The generation of antiviral CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells by CliniMACS CCS can be extended to a broad spectrum of common pathogen-derived peptide pools in single or multiple applications to facilitate and enhance the efficacy of adoptive T-cell immunotherapy.

Citing Articles

"Attack!" Cellular Therapies to Attack Pathogens and Tumors.

Eiz-Vesper B, Bonig H Transfus Med Hemother. 2025; 52(1):1-4.

PMID: 39944410 PMC: 11813275. DOI: 10.1159/000543415.


DNA methylation profiling identifies TBKBP1 as potent amplifier of cytotoxic activity in CMV-specific human CD8+ T cells.

Yu Z, Sasidharan-Nair V, Buchta T, Bonifacius A, Khan F, Pietzsch B PLoS Pathog. 2024; 20(9):e1012581.

PMID: 39325839 PMC: 11460711. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012581.


Patient-tailored adoptive immunotherapy with EBV-specific T cells from related and unrelated donors.

Bonifacius A, Lamottke B, Tischer-Zimmermann S, Schultze-Florey R, Goudeva L, Heuft H J Clin Invest. 2023; 133(12).

PMID: 37159273 PMC: 10266790. DOI: 10.1172/JCI163548.


Long-Term Follow-Up after Adoptive Transfer of BK-Virus-Specific T Cells in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.

Koldehoff M, Eiz-Vesper B, Maecker-Kolhoff B, Steckel N, Dittmer U, Horn P Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(4).

PMID: 37112757 PMC: 10141379. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11040845.


Antigen-Specific T Cells and SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Current Approaches and Future Possibilities.

Nova Z, Zemanek T, Botek N Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(23).

PMID: 36499448 PMC: 9737069. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232315122.


References
1.
Sukdolak C, Tischer S, Dieks D, Figueiredo C, Goudeva L, Heuft H . CMV-, EBV- and ADV-specific T cell immunity: screening and monitoring of potential third-party donors to improve post-transplantation outcome. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013; 19(10):1480-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.07.015. View

2.
Schmitt A, Tonn T, Busch D, Grigoleit G, Einsele H, Odendahl M . Adoptive transfer and selective reconstitution of streptamer-selected cytomegalovirus-specific CD8+ T cells leads to virus clearance in patients after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Transfusion. 2010; 51(3):591-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02940.x. View

3.
Bunse C, Borchers S, Varanasi P, Tischer S, Figueiredo C, Immenschuh S . Impaired functionality of antiviral T cells in G-CSF mobilized stem cell donors: implications for the selection of CTL donor. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e77925. PMC: 3850912. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077925. View

4.
Khanna R, Smith C . Cellular immune therapy for viral infections in transplant patients. Indian J Med Res. 2014; 138(5):796-807. PMC: 3928710. View

5.
Saglio F, Hanley P, Bollard C . The time is now: moving toward virus-specific T cells after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as the standard of care. Cytotherapy. 2014; 16(2):149-59. PMC: 3928596. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.11.010. View