Structural Significance of an Internal Water Molecule Studied by Site-directed Mutagenesis of Tyrosine-67 in Rat Cytochrome C
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The tyrosine-67 to phenylalanine mutated rat cytochrome c is similar to the unmutated protein in its spectral, reduction potential, and enzymic electron-transfer properties. However, the loss of the 695-nm band, characteristic of the ferric form of the normal low-spin physiologically active configuration, occurs 1.2 pH units higher on the alkaline side and 0.7 pH unit lower on the acid side. Similarly, the heme iron-methionine-80 sulfur bond is more stable to temperature, with the midpoint of the transition being 30 degrees C higher, corresponding to an increase in delta H of 5 kcal/mol (1 cal = 4.184 J), partially mitigated by an increase of 11 entropy units in delta S. Urea has only slightly different effects on the two proteins. These phenomena are best explained by considering that the loss of one of the three hydrogen-bonding side chains, tyrosine-67, asparagine-52, and threonine-78, which hold an internal water molecule on the "left, lower front" side of the protein [Takano, T. & Dickerson, R. E. (1981) J. Mol. Biol. 153, 95-115], is sufficient to prevent its inclusion in the mutant protein, leading to a more stable structure, and, as indicated by preliminary proton NMR two-dimensional phase-sensitive nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy analyses, a reorganization of this area. This hypothesis predicts that elimination of the hydrogen-bonding ability of residue 52 or 78 would also result in cytochromes c having similar properties. It is not obvious why the space-filling structure involving the internalized water molecule that leads to a destabilization energy of about 3 kcal/mol should be subject to extreme evolutionary conservation, when a more stable and apparently fully functional structure is readily available.
Tomasina F, Martinez J, Zeida A, Chiribao M, Demicheli V, Correa A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(47):e2213432119.
PMID: 36378644 PMC: 9704708. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2213432119.
Ramasarma T, Vaigundan D Mol Cell Biochem. 2018; 453(1-2):197-203.
PMID: 30194583 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-018-3445-2.
Gu J, Shin D, Pletneva E Biochemistry. 2017; 56(23):2950-2966.
PMID: 28474881 PMC: 5647788. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b01187.
Amacher J, Zhong F, Lisi G, Zhu M, Alden S, Hoke K J Am Chem Soc. 2015; 137(26):8435-49.
PMID: 26038984 PMC: 4970523. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b01493.
The role of key residues in structure, function, and stability of cytochrome-c.
Zaidi S, Hassan M, Islam A, Ahmad F Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013; 71(2):229-55.
PMID: 23615770 PMC: 11113841. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-013-1341-1.