» Articles » PMID: 25334006

Spatial Versus Temporal Laser Speckle Contrast Analyses in the Presence of Static Optical Scatterers

Overview
Journal J Biomed Opt
Date 2014 Oct 22
PMID 25334006
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previously published data demonstrate that the temporal processing algorithm for laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) can improve the visibility of deep blood vessels and is less susceptible to static speckle artifacts when compared with the spatial algorithm. To the best of our knowledge, the extent to which the temporal algorithm can accurately predict the speckle contrast associated with flow in deep blood vessels has not been quantified. Here, we employed two phantom systems and imaging setups (epi-illumination and transillumination) to study the contrast predicted by the spatial and temporal algorithms in subsurface capillary tubes as a function of the camera exposure time and the actual flow speed. Our data with both imaging setups suggest that the contrast predicted by the temporal algorithm, and therefore the relative flow speed, is nearly independent of the degree of static optical scattering that contributes to the overall measured speckle pattern. Collectively, these results strongly suggest the potential of temporal LSCI at a single-exposure time to assess accurately the changes in blood flow even in the presence of substantial static optical scattering.

Citing Articles

Multi-spectral laser speckle contrast imaging for depth-resolved blood perfusion assessment.

Hussein L, Moazeni S J Biomed Opt. 2025; 30(2):023517.

PMID: 40008291 PMC: 11853228. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.30.2.023517.


Rolling shutter speckle plethysmography for quantitative cardiovascular monitoring.

Lee Y, Byun S, Yi C, Jung J, Ah Lee S Biomed Opt Express. 2024; 15(3):1540-1552.

PMID: 38495693 PMC: 10942690. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.511755.


Improvement of clinical wound microcirculation diagnosis using an object tracking-based laser speckle contrast imaging system.

Hsieh M, Chang C, Hsu C, Lin Y, Hsieh P, Ching C APL Bioeng. 2024; 8(1):016105.

PMID: 38292062 PMC: 10827336. DOI: 10.1063/5.0172443.


Improved spatial speckle contrast model for tissue blood flow imaging: effects of spatial correlation among neighboring camera pixels.

Juarez-Ramirez J, Coyotl-Ocelotl B, Choi B, Ramos-Garcia R, Spezzia-Mazzocco T, Ramirez-San-Juan J J Biomed Opt. 2023; 28(12):125002.

PMID: 38074216 PMC: 10704254. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.28.12.125002.


SpeckleCam: high-resolution computational speckle contrast tomography for deep blood flow imaging.

Maity A, Sharma M, Veeraraghavan A, Sabharwal A Biomed Opt Express. 2023; 14(10):5316-5337.

PMID: 37854569 PMC: 10581815. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.498900.


References
1.
Ramirez-San-Juan J, Ramos-Garcia R, Martinez-Niconoff G, Choi B . Simple correction factor for laser speckle imaging of flow dynamics. Opt Lett. 2014; 39(3):678-81. PMC: 4030066. DOI: 10.1364/OL.39.000678. View

2.
Tamaki Y, Araie M, Kawamoto E, Eguchi S, Fujii H . Non-contact, two-dimensional measurement of tissue circulation in choroid and optic nerve head using laser speckle phenomenon. Exp Eye Res. 1995; 60(4):373-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0014-4835(05)80094-6. View

3.
Thompson O, Andrews M, Hirst E . Correction for spatial averaging in laser speckle contrast analysis. Biomed Opt Express. 2011; 2(4):1021-9. PMC: 3072115. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.2.001021. View

4.
Riva C, Ross B, Benedek G . Laser Doppler measurements of blood flow in capillary tubes and retinal arteries. Invest Ophthalmol. 1972; 11(11):936-44. View

5.
Choi B, Kang N, Nelson J . Laser speckle imaging for monitoring blood flow dynamics in the in vivo rodent dorsal skin fold model. Microvasc Res. 2004; 68(2):143-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2004.04.003. View