» Articles » PMID: 25173845

Hybrid Incompatibility Arises in a Sequence-based Bioenergetic Model of Transcription Factor Binding

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2014 Sep 1
PMID 25173845
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Postzygotic isolation between incipient species results from the accumulation of incompatibilities that arise as a consequence of genetic divergence. When phenotypes are determined by regulatory interactions, hybrid incompatibility can evolve even as a consequence of parallel adaptation in parental populations because interacting genes can produce the same phenotype through incompatible allelic combinations. We explore the evolutionary conditions that promote and constrain hybrid incompatibility in regulatory networks using a bioenergetic model (combining thermodynamics and kinetics) of transcriptional regulation, considering the bioenergetic basis of molecular interactions between transcription factors (TFs) and their binding sites. The bioenergetic parameters consider the free energy of formation of the bond between the TF and its binding site and the availability of TFs in the intracellular environment. Together these determine fractional occupancy of the TF on the promoter site, the degree of subsequent gene expression and in diploids, and the degree of dominance among allelic interactions. This results in a sigmoid genotype-phenotype map and fitness landscape, with the details of the shape determining the degree of bioenergetic evolutionary constraint on hybrid incompatibility. Using individual-based simulations, we subjected two allopatric populations to parallel directional or stabilizing selection. Misregulation of hybrid gene expression occurred under either type of selection, although it evolved faster under directional selection. Under directional selection, the extent of hybrid incompatibility increased with the slope of the genotype-phenotype map near the derived parental expression level. Under stabilizing selection, hybrid incompatibility arose from compensatory mutations and was greater when the bioenergetic properties of the interaction caused the space of nearly neutral genotypes around the stable expression level to be wide. F2's showed higher hybrid incompatibility than F1's to the extent that the bioenergetic properties favored dominant regulatory interactions. The present model is a mechanistically explicit case of the Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller model, connecting environmental selective pressure to hybrid incompatibility through the molecular mechanism of regulatory divergence. The bioenergetic parameters that determine expression represent measurable properties of transcriptional regulation, providing a predictive framework for empirical studies of how phenotypic evolution results in epistatic incompatibility at the molecular level in hybrids.

Citing Articles

Comparative transcriptomics in serial organs uncovers early and pan-organ developmental changes associated with organ-specific morphological adaptation.

Semon M, Mouginot M, Peltier M, Corneloup C, Veber P, Gueguen L Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):768.

PMID: 39824799 PMC: 11742040. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-55826-w.


Understanding developmental system drift.

McColgan A, DiFrisco J Development. 2024; 151(20).

PMID: 39417684 PMC: 11529278. DOI: 10.1242/dev.203054.


Unifying framework explaining how parental regulatory divergence can drive gene expression in hybrids and allopolyploids.

Janko K, Eisner J, Cigler P, Tichopad T Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8714.

PMID: 39379366 PMC: 11461870. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52546-5.


Gene regulation and speciation in a migratory divide between songbirds.

Louder M, Justen H, Kimmitt A, Lawley K, Turner L, Dickman J Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):98.

PMID: 38167733 PMC: 10761872. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-44352-2.


Environment-dependent epistasis increases phenotypic diversity in gene regulatory networks.

Baier F, Gauye F, Perez-Carrasco R, Payne J, Schaerli Y Sci Adv. 2023; 9(21):eadf1773.

PMID: 37224262 PMC: 10208579. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adf1773.


References
1.
Ezer D, Zabet N, Adryan B . Physical constraints determine the logic of bacterial promoter architectures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42(7):4196-207. PMC: 3985651. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku078. View

2.
Raumann B, Knight K, Sauer R . Dramatic changes in DNA-binding specificity caused by single residue substitutions in an Arc/Mnt hybrid repressor. Nat Struct Biol. 1995; 2(12):1115-22. DOI: 10.1038/nsb1295-1115. View

3.
Jovelin R . Rapid sequence evolution of transcription factors controlling neuron differentiation in Caenorhabditis. Mol Biol Evol. 2009; 26(10):2373-86. PMC: 2766936. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msp142. View

4.
Fierst J, Hansen T . Genetic architecture and postzygotic reproductive isolation: evolution of Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities in a polygenic model. Evolution. 2009; 64(3):675-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00861.x. View

5.
Hansen T, Wagner G . Modeling genetic architecture: a multilinear theory of gene interaction. Theor Popul Biol. 2001; 59(1):61-86. DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.2000.1508. View