» Articles » PMID: 24476912

Physical Constraints Determine the Logic of Bacterial Promoter Architectures

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2014 Jan 31
PMID 24476912
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Site-specific transcription factors (TFs) bind to their target sites on the DNA, where they regulate the rate at which genes are transcribed. Bacterial TFs undergo facilitated diffusion (a combination of 3D diffusion around and 1D random walk on the DNA) when searching for their target sites. Using computer simulations of this search process, we show that the organization of the binding sites, in conjunction with TF copy number and binding site affinity, plays an important role in determining not only the steady state of promoter occupancy, but also the order at which TFs bind. These effects can be captured by facilitated diffusion-based models, but not by standard thermodynamics. We show that the spacing of binding sites encodes complex logic, which can be derived from combinations of three basic building blocks: switches, barriers and clusters, whose response alone and in higher orders of organization we characterize in detail. Effective promoter organizations are commonly found in the E. coli genome and are highly conserved between strains. This will allow studies of gene regulation at a previously unprecedented level of detail, where our framework can create testable hypothesis of promoter logic.

Citing Articles

CDBProm: the Comprehensive Directory of Bacterial Promoters.

Martinez G, Perez-Rueda E, Kumar A, Dutt M, Maya C, Ledesma-Dominguez L NAR Genom Bioinform. 2024; 6(1):lqae018.

PMID: 38385146 PMC: 10880602. DOI: 10.1093/nargab/lqae018.


Identifying the Gene Regulatory Network of the Starvation-Induced Transcriptional Activator Nla28.

Ma M, Garza A, Lemon D, Caro E, Ritchie L, Ryan C J Bacteriol. 2022; 204(12):e0026522.

PMID: 36448789 PMC: 9765219. DOI: 10.1128/jb.00265-22.


Systematic analysis of low-affinity transcription factor binding site clusters in vitro and in vivo establishes their functional relevance.

Shahein A, Lopez-Malo M, Istomin I, Olson E, Cheng S, Maerkl S Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):5273.

PMID: 36071116 PMC: 9452512. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32971-0.


Limits to a classic paradigm: most transcription factors in E. coli regulate genes involved in multiple biological processes.

Ledezma-Tejeida D, Altamirano-Pacheco L, Fajardo V, Collado-Vides J Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47(13):6656-6667.

PMID: 31194874 PMC: 6649764. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz525.


Canonical and single-cell Hi-C reveal distinct chromatin interaction sub-networks of mammalian transcription factors.

Ma X, Ezer D, Adryan B, Stevens T Genome Biol. 2018; 19(1):174.

PMID: 30359306 PMC: 6203279. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-018-1558-2.


References
1.
Hammar P, Leroy P, Mahmutovic A, Marklund E, Berg O, Elf J . The lac repressor displays facilitated diffusion in living cells. Science. 2012; 336(6088):1595-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1221648. View

2.
Roider H, Kanhere A, Manke T, Vingron M . Predicting transcription factor affinities to DNA from a biophysical model. Bioinformatics. 2006; 23(2):134-41. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl565. View

3.
Wunderlich Z, Mirny L . Spatial effects on the speed and reliability of protein-DNA search. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36(11):3570-8. PMC: 2441786. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkn173. View

4.
Zabet N . System size reduction in stochastic simulations of the facilitated diffusion mechanism. BMC Syst Biol. 2012; 6:121. PMC: 3567987. DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-121. View

5.
Ackers G, Johnson A, Shea M . Quantitative model for gene regulation by lambda phage repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982; 79(4):1129-33. PMC: 345914. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.79.4.1129. View