» Articles » PMID: 25166500

Evaluation of Prompted Annotation of Activity Data Recorded from a Smart Phone

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2014 Aug 29
PMID 25166500
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this paper we discuss the design and evaluation of a mobile based tool to collect activity data on a large scale. The current approach, based on an existing activity recognition module, recognizes class transitions from a set of specific activities (for example walking and running) to the standing still activity. Once this transition is detected the system prompts the user to provide a label for their previous activity. This label, along with the raw sensor data, is then stored locally prior to being uploaded to cloud storage. The system was evaluated by ten users. Three evaluation protocols were used, including a structured, semi-structured and free living protocol. Results indicate that the mobile application could be used to allow the user to provide accurate ground truth labels for their activity data. Similarities of up to 100% where observed when comparing the user prompted labels and those from an observer during structured lab based experiments. Further work will examine data segmentation and personalization issues in order to refine the system.

Citing Articles

Classification of human walking context using a single-point accelerometer.

Baroudi L, Barton K, Cain S, Shorter K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3039.

PMID: 38321039 PMC: 10847110. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53143-8.


Railway Axle Early Fatigue Crack Detection through Condition Monitoring Techniques.

Gomez M, Castejon C, Corral E, Cocconcelli M Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(13).

PMID: 37447993 PMC: 10346258. DOI: 10.3390/s23136143.


Real-Time Change Point Detection with application to Smart Home Time Series Data.

Aminikhanghahi S, Wang T, Cook D IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2022; 31(5):1010-1023.

PMID: 35903759 PMC: 9328027. DOI: 10.1109/tkde.2018.2850347.


A Semi-Automatic Annotation Approach for Human Activity Recognition.

Bota P, Silva J, Folgado D, Gamboa H Sensors (Basel). 2019; 19(3).

PMID: 30691040 PMC: 6387461. DOI: 10.3390/s19030501.


Automatic Annotation for Human Activity Recognition in Free Living Using a Smartphone.

Cruciani F, Cleland I, Nugent C, McCullagh P, Synnes K, Hallberg J Sensors (Basel). 2018; 18(7).

PMID: 29987218 PMC: 6068801. DOI: 10.3390/s18072203.


References
1.
Parkka J, Ermes M, Korpipaa P, Mantyjarvi J, Peltola J, Korhonen I . Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2006; 10(1):119-28. DOI: 10.1109/titb.2005.856863. View

2.
Xu J, Pottie G, Kaiser W . Enabling large-scale ground-truth acquisition and system evaluation in wireless health. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012; 60(1):174-8. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2208111. View

3.
Olivares A, Ramirez J, Gorriz J, Olivares G, Damas M . Detection of (in)activity periods in human body motion using inertial sensors: a comparative study. Sensors (Basel). 2012; 12(5):5791-814. PMC: 3386712. DOI: 10.3390/s120505791. View

4.
Mannini A, Intille S, Rosenberger M, Sabatini A, Haskell W . Activity recognition using a single accelerometer placed at the wrist or ankle. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 45(11):2193-203. PMC: 3795931. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31829736d6. View

5.
Stikic M, Larlus D, Ebert S, Schiele B . Weakly Supervised Recognition of Daily Life Activities with Wearable Sensors. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2011; 33(12):2521-37. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2011.36. View