» Articles » PMID: 23604069

Activity Recognition Using a Single Accelerometer Placed at the Wrist or Ankle

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2013 Apr 23
PMID 23604069
Citations 107
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Large physical activity surveillance projects such as the UK Biobank and NHANES are using wrist-worn accelerometer-based activity monitors that collect raw data. The goal is to increase wear time by asking subjects to wear the monitors on the wrist instead of the hip, and then to use information in the raw signal to improve activity type and intensity estimation. The purposes of this work was to obtain an algorithm to process wrist and ankle raw data and to classify behavior into four broad activity classes: ambulation, cycling, sedentary, and other activities.

Methods: Participants (N = 33) wearing accelerometers on the wrist and ankle performed 26 daily activities. The accelerometer data were collected, cleaned, and preprocessed to extract features that characterize 2-, 4-, and 12.8-s data windows. Feature vectors encoding information about frequency and intensity of motion extracted from analysis of the raw signal were used with a support vector machine classifier to identify a subject's activity. Results were compared with categories classified by a human observer. Algorithms were validated using a leave-one-subject-out strategy. The computational complexity of each processing step was also evaluated.

Results: With 12.8-s windows, the proposed strategy showed high classification accuracies for ankle data (95.0%) that decreased to 84.7% for wrist data. Shorter (4 s) windows only minimally decreased performances of the algorithm on the wrist to 84.2%.

Conclusions: A classification algorithm using 13 features shows good classification into the four classes given the complexity of the activities in the original data set. The algorithm is computationally efficient and could be implemented in real time on mobile devices with only 4-s latency.

Citing Articles

A stacked CNN and random forest ensemble architecture for complex nursing activity recognition and nurse identification.

Rahman A, Nahid N, Schuller B, Ahad M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31667.

PMID: 39738208 PMC: 11685546. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81228-x.


Identifying Infant Body Position from Inertial Sensors with Machine Learning: Which Parameters Matter?.

Duda-Golawska J, Rogowski A, Laudanska Z, Zygierewicz J, Tomalski P Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(23).

PMID: 39686346 PMC: 11644974. DOI: 10.3390/s24237809.


The effectiveness of digital health interventions for the maintenance of physical activity following cardiac rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Luijk A, Mortensen S, Hamborg T, Zangger G, Ahler J, Christensen J Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241286641.

PMID: 39421312 PMC: 11483784. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241286641.


Innovative Detection and Segmentation of Mobility Activities in Patients Living with Parkinson's Disease Using a Single Ankle-Positioned Smartwatch.

Goubault E, Duval C, Martin C, Lebel K Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(17).

PMID: 39275396 PMC: 11398008. DOI: 10.3390/s24175486.


Human Activity Recognition Algorithm with Physiological and Inertial Signals Fusion: Photoplethysmography, Electrodermal Activity, and Accelerometry.

Gilmore J, Nasseri M Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(10).

PMID: 38793858 PMC: 11124986. DOI: 10.3390/s24103005.


References
1.
Li Q, Young M, Naing V, Donelan J . Walking speed estimation using a shank-mounted inertial measurement unit. J Biomech. 2010; 43(8):1640-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.031. View

2.
Rosenberger M, Haskell W, Albinali F, Mota S, Nawyn J, Intille S . Estimating activity and sedentary behavior from an accelerometer on the hip or wrist. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 45(5):964-75. PMC: 3631449. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31827f0d9c. View

3.
Welk G, Blair S, Wood K, Jones S, Thompson R . A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32(9 Suppl):S489-97. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00008. View

4.
Bourke A, ODonovan K, OLaighin G . The identification of vertical velocity profiles using an inertial sensor to investigate pre-impact detection of falls. Med Eng Phys. 2008; 30(7):937-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.12.003. View

5.
Albinali F, Intille S, Haskell W, Rosenberger M . Using Wearable Activity Type Detection to Improve Physical Activity Energy Expenditure Estimation. Proc ACM Int Conf Ubiquitous Comput. 2018; 2010:311-320. PMC: 6122605. DOI: 10.1145/1864349.1864396. View