» Articles » PMID: 22157771

New Horizons in Sensor Development

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2011 Dec 14
PMID 22157771
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Accelerometry and other sensing technologies are important tools for physical activity measurement. Engineering advances have allowed developers to transform clunky, uncomfortable, and conspicuous monitors into relatively small, ergonomic, and convenient research tools. New devices can be used to collect data on overall physical activity and, in some cases, posture, physiological state, and location, for many days or weeks from subjects during their everyday lives. In this review article, we identify emerging trends in several types of monitoring technologies and gaps in the current state of knowledge.

Best Practices: The only certainty about the future of activity-sensing technologies is that researchers must anticipate and plan for change. We propose a set of best practices that may accelerate adoption of new devices and increase the likelihood that data being collected and used today will be compatible with new data sets and methods likely to appear on the horizon.

Future Directions: We describe several technology-driven trends, ranging from continued miniaturization of devices that provide gross summary information about activity levels and energy expenditure to new devices that provide highly detailed information about the specific type, amount, and location of physical activity. Some devices will take advantage of consumer technologies, such as mobile phones, to detect and respond to physical activity in real time, creating new opportunities in measurement, remote compliance monitoring, data-driven discovery, and intervention.

Citing Articles

Raw Photoplethysmography as an Enhancement for Research-Grade Wearable Activity Monitors.

Hibbing P, Khan M JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024; 12:e57158.

PMID: 39331461 PMC: 11470225. DOI: 10.2196/57158.


Concurrent Validity and Reliability of a Free Smartphone Application for Evaluation of Jump Height.

Dias A, Pires P, Santana L, Marques P, Espada M, Santos F J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024; 9(3).

PMID: 39311263 PMC: 11417773. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk9030155.


Maximizing the Utility and Comparability of Accelerometer Data from Large-Scale Epidemiologic Studies.

Lee I, Moore C, Evenson K J Meas Phys Behav. 2023; 6(1):6-12.

PMID: 37206661 PMC: 10194828. DOI: 10.1123/jmpb.2022-0035.


Physical Activity Surveillance in Children and Adolescents Using Smartphone Technology: Systematic Review.

Nasruddin N, Murphy J, Armstrong M JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023; 6:e42461.

PMID: 36989033 PMC: 10131756. DOI: 10.2196/42461.


The impact of selected methodological factors on data collection outcomes in observational studies of device-measured physical behaviour in adults: A systematic review.

Pulsford R, Brocklebank L, Fenton S, Bakker E, Mielke G, Tsai L Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023; 20(1):26.

PMID: 36890553 PMC: 9993720. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-022-01388-9.


References
1.
Achten J, Jeukendrup A . Heart rate monitoring: applications and limitations. Sports Med. 2003; 33(7):517-38. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200333070-00004. View

2.
Goldberger A, Amaral L, Glass L, Hausdorff J, Ivanov P, Mark R . PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation. 2000; 101(23):E215-20. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.101.23.e215. View

3.
Zhang K, Werner P, Sun M, Pi-Sunyer F, Boozer C . Measurement of human daily physical activity. Obes Res. 2003; 11(1):33-40. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2003.7. View

4.
Pober D, Staudenmayer J, Raphael C, Freedson P . Development of novel techniques to classify physical activity mode using accelerometers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38(9):1626-34. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000227542.43669.45. View

5.
Mariappan A, Bosch M, Zhu F, Boushey C, Kerr D, Ebert D . Personal Dietary Assessment Using Mobile Devices. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2011; 7246. PMC: 3109913. DOI: 10.1117/12.813556. View