» Articles » PMID: 25068035

The Software Ontology (SWO): a Resource for Reproducibility in Biomedical Data Analysis, Curation and Digital Preservation

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2014 Jul 29
PMID 25068035
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Motivation: Biomedical ontologists to date have concentrated on ontological descriptions of biomedical entities such as gene products and their attributes, phenotypes and so on. Recently, effort has diversified to descriptions of the laboratory investigations by which these entities were produced. However, much biological insight is gained from the analysis of the data produced from these investigations, and there is a lack of adequate descriptions of the wide range of software that are central to bioinformatics. We need to describe how data are analyzed for discovery, audit trails, provenance and reproducibility.

Results: The Software Ontology (SWO) is a description of software used to store, manage and analyze data. Input to the SWO has come from beyond the life sciences, but its main focus is the life sciences. We used agile techniques to gather input for the SWO and keep engagement with our users. The result is an ontology that meets the needs of a broad range of users by describing software, its information processing tasks, data inputs and outputs, data formats versions and so on. Recently, the SWO has incorporated EDAM, a vocabulary for describing data and related concepts in bioinformatics. The SWO is currently being used to describe software used in multiple biomedical applications.

Conclusion: The SWO is another element of the biomedical ontology landscape that is necessary for the description of biomedical entities and how they were discovered. An ontology of software used to analyze data produced by investigations in the life sciences can be made in such a way that it covers the important features requested and prioritized by its users. The SWO thus fits into the landscape of biomedical ontologies and is produced using techniques designed to keep it in line with user's needs.

Availability: The Software Ontology is available under an Apache 2.0 license at http://theswo.sourceforge.net/; the Software Ontology blog can be read at http://softwareontology.wordpress.com.

Citing Articles

ENCORE: a practical implementation to improve reproducibility and transparency of computational research.

van Kampen A, Mahamune U, Jongejan A, van Schaik B, Balashova D, Lashgari D Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8117.

PMID: 39284801 PMC: 11405857. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52446-8.


Dermoscopy Differential Diagnosis Explorer (D3X) Ontology to Aggregate and Link Dermoscopic Patterns to Differential Diagnoses: Development and Usability Study.

Lin R, Amith M, Wang C, Strickley J, Tao C JMIR Med Inform. 2024; 12:e49613.

PMID: 38904996 PMC: 11226929. DOI: 10.2196/49613.


Application of an ontology for model cards to generate computable artifacts for linking machine learning information from biomedical research.

Amith M, Cui L, Roberts K, Tao C Proc Int World Wide Web Conf. 2024; 2023(Companion):820-825.

PMID: 38327770 PMC: 10848146. DOI: 10.1145/3543873.3587601.


Ontologies for increasing the FAIRness of plant research data.

Dumschott K, Dorpholz H, Laporte M, Brilhaus D, Schrader A, Usadel B Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1279694.

PMID: 38098789 PMC: 10720748. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1279694.


Evaluating LC-HRMS metabolomics data processing software using FAIR principles for research software.

Du X, Dastmalchi F, Ye H, Garrett T, Diller M, Liu M Metabolomics. 2023; 19(2):11.

PMID: 36745241 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-023-01974-3.


References
1.
Jupp S, Horridge M, Iannone L, Klein J, Owen S, Schanstra J . Populous: a tool for building OWL ontologies from templates. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012; 13 Suppl 1:S5. PMC: 3471341. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-S1-S5. View

2.
Jupp S, Malone J, Bolleman J, Brandizi M, Davies M, Garcia L . The EBI RDF platform: linked open data for the life sciences. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(9):1338-9. PMC: 3998127. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt765. View

3.
Hull D, Wolstencroft K, Stevens R, Goble C, Pocock M, Li P . Taverna: a tool for building and running workflows of services. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34(Web Server issue):W729-32. PMC: 1538887. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl320. View

4.
Ashburner M, Ball C, Blake J, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry J . Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000; 25(1):25-9. PMC: 3037419. DOI: 10.1038/75556. View

5.
Wolstencroft K, Alper P, Hull D, Wroe C, Lord P, Stevens R . The (my)Grid ontology: bioinformatics service discovery. Int J Bioinform Res Appl. 2007; 3(3):303-25. DOI: 10.1504/IJBRA.2007.015005. View