Preoperative Clinical Predictors of Difficult Laryngeal Exposure for Microlaryngoscopy: the Laryngoscore
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives/hypothesis: To identify a clinical predictor score for difficult laryngeal exposure (DLE) during operative microlaryngoscopy.
Study Design: Prospective cohort study in two academic institutions.
Methods: We evaluated 319 patients before microlaryngoscopy for benign and malignant glottic diseases by a standardized preoperative assessment protocol (Laryngoscore) that included 11 parameters: interincisors gap (IIG), thyro-mental distance, upper jaw dental status, trismus, mandibular prognathism, macroglossia, micrognathia, degree of neck flexion-extension, history of previous open-neck and/or radiotherapy, Mallampati's modified score, and body mass index (BMI). Each parameter was assessed to obtain a total score. Patients were divided into five classes according to the anterior commissure (AC) visualization: class 0, complete AC visualization with large-bore laryngoscopes in the Boyce-Jackson position; class I, as class 0 with external laryngeal counterpressure; class II, as class I in the flexion-flexion position; class III, as class II using small-bore laryngoscopes; and class IV, impossible AC visualization.
Results: Class 0-I-II (good/acceptable laryngeal exposure) presented a median score < 6. This value was chosen as cutoff for distinguishing favorable versus difficult/impossible laryngeal exposures. When the Laryngoscore was < 6, good laryngeal exposure was observed in 94% of patients, whereas when ≥ 6, DLE was encountered in 40%. When considering a Laryngoscore of ≥ 9, 67% of patients had a DLE. At univariate analysis, IIG, upper jaw dental status, macroglossia, micrognathia, degree of neck flexion-extension, and BMI statistically impacted on DLE (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: The Laryngoscore is a good predictor of DLE and assists in selecting the ideal candidates for operative microlaryngoscopy.
Level Of Evidence: 2b.
Marchi F, Bellini E, Ioppi A, Iandelli A, Filauro M, Sampieri C Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2025; 44(6):368-376.
PMID: 39763461 PMC: 11706522. DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2958.
Bending the rules: A novel approach to laryngeal surgery in a body donor study.
Kienle L, Schild L, Boehm F, Hahn V, Greve J, von Witzleben A Head Neck. 2024; 47(2):575-585.
PMID: 39327800 PMC: 11717936. DOI: 10.1002/hed.27939.
Piazza C, Gennarini F, Montenegro C, Lancini D, Del Bon F, Zigliani G Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2024; 44(Suppl. 1):S3-S11.
PMID: 38745511 PMC: 11098537. DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-44-2024-N2850.
Wang M, Liu Y, Qiu Y, Chen H, Liwen W, Huang D Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 17(2):177-187.
PMID: 38659242 PMC: 11150997. DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2023.00023.
Office Rigid Laryngoscopy as a Predictor for Glottic Exposure in Microlaryngoscopy.
Manjunath M, Sachidananda R, Jyothi Swarup R, Sreenivasa Murthy T Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 76(2):1765-1769.
PMID: 38566634 PMC: 10982169. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-04403-y.