» Articles » PMID: 38566634

Office Rigid Laryngoscopy As a Predictor for Glottic Exposure in Microlaryngoscopy

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2024 Apr 3
PMID 38566634
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Good glottic exposure is a prerequisite for a good microlaryngeal surgery. Often this is difficult to predict preoperatively. This study aims to evaluate the utility of office-based rigid laryngoscopy (70°) as a screening tool to predict laryngeal exposure during micro laryngoscopy. Sixty-nine patients underwent office-based rigid laryngeal examination followed by micro laryngoscopic surgery for benign vocal cord lesions. Office-based laryngoscopy was classified as grade 1 when the entire glottis with anterior commissure (AC) was visualized without undue traction of tongue; grade 2 when AC was visualized only during phonation and with some traction of tongue and grade 3 when there is an inability to visualise the glottis adequately despite moderate traction of tongue and the examination was completed using a flexible scope. These were correlated with laryngeal exposure during micro laryngoscopy. 42 patients were categorized as grade 1 out of which 39 (93%) had a favourable laryngeal exposure (class 1) while only 3 (7%) had a partially favourable exposure (class 2). 18 patients were categorized as grade 2 out of which 12(66%) had a favourable exposure (class 1) as against 6 (33%) who had a partially favourable exposure (class 2). Nine of our patients were categorized as grade 3 out of which all 9 (100%) had an unfavourable exposure (class 3) requiring angled tele laryngoscopy to complete the surgery. A strong correlation between office-based laryngoscopic grading and exposure during operative laryngoscopy was obtained statistically (Cramer's V test, V = 0.746). Office examination with a 70° telescope is a good predictor of glottic exposure during micro laryngoscopy. We believe that the ease of performing a micro laryngoscopy in the operating room is directly proportional to the ease of doing laryngoscopy in the office.

References
1.
Sanchez-Morillo J, Estruch-Perez M, Hernandez-Cadiz M, Tamarit-Conejeros J, Gomez-Diago L, Richart-Aznar M . Indirect laryngoscopy with rigid 70-degree laryngoscope as a predictor of difficult direct laryngoscopy. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2012; 63(4):272-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.otorri.2012.01.007. View

2.
Roh J, Lee Y . Prediction of difficult laryngeal exposure in patients undergoing microlaryngosurgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005; 114(8):614-20. DOI: 10.1177/000348940511400806. View

3.
Arjun A, Dutta A . A Study of Application of Preoperative Clinical Predictors of Difficult Laryngeal Exposure for Microlaryngoscopy: The Laryngoscore in the Indian Population. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019; 71(4):480-485. PMC: 6838268. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-019-01658-2. View

4.
Paul R, Varghese A, Mathew J, Chandrasekharan R, Amalanathan S, Asif S . Difficult Laryngeal Exposure in Microlaryngoscopy: Can it be Predicted Preoperatively?. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 68(1):65-70. PMC: 4809832. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-015-0913-9. View

5.
Piazza C, Mangili S, Del Bon F, Paderno A, Grazioli P, Barbieri D . Preoperative clinical predictors of difficult laryngeal exposure for microlaryngoscopy: the Laryngoscore. Laryngoscope. 2014; 124(11):2561-7. DOI: 10.1002/lary.24803. View