» Articles » PMID: 35750703

Prediction of Difficulty in Direct Laryngoscopy

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Jun 24
PMID 35750703
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To establish easily measurable and reproducible preoperative parameters predicting difficult laryngeal exposure in direct laryngoscopy. A prospective study including 71 patients who underwent transoral microsurgery for benign or malignant lesions of the larynx was performed in our department from January 2021 to November 2021. Physical assessment included the Mallampati score, weight, height, body mass index and measurements of seven parameters in the cervical region. Eleven parameters were measured on the cervical radiography film. Among our patients, 19 were included in the difficult laryngeal exposure (DLE) group. High Mallampati and Cormack scores were significantly associated with DLE (p = 0.005 and p < 0.0001). Limited mouth opening, direct thyromental distance (DTMD) < 67 mm in neutral position, DTMD < 82 mm and sternomental distance < 157 mm at full head extension were statistically related to DLE. For radiological assessment, the effective length of the maxilla and the atlanto-occipital distance were related to DLE. Using stepwise logistic regression, only the effective length of the maxilla and atlanto-occipital distance were selected as independent predictors for DLE (p: 0.015 and 0.001). Preoperative prediction of DLE is useful for both surgeons and patients. The length of the maxilla and the atlanto-occipital distance were found to be independent risk factors for DLE. This highlights the effect of overgrowth of the maxilla, protrusion of the upper teeth and limited extension of the cervical spine as the major risk factors for difficult laryngeal exposure.

Citing Articles

Radiological indicators and a novel combined predictive model for anticipating difficult laryngoscopy in cervical spondylosis patients: a prospective cohort study.

Li J, Tian Y, Wang M, Fang J, Zhang H, Yue F BMC Anesthesiol. 2024; 24(1):446.

PMID: 39623345 PMC: 11610216. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02826-w.


Predictors of Difficult Laryngeal Exposure in Suspension Laryngoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Wang M, Liu Y, Qiu Y, Chen H, Liwen W, Huang D Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 17(2):177-187.

PMID: 38659242 PMC: 11150997. DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2023.00023.


Trends in Preoperative Airway Assessment.

Marchis I, Negrut M, Blebea C, Crihan M, Alexa A, Breazu C Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38535030 PMC: 10968937. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14060610.


Bedside preoperative predictors of difficult laryngeal exposure in microlaryngeal surgery.

Teixeira M, Castro E, Medeiros N, Pina P, Alves S, Oliveira P Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 281(5):2539-2546.

PMID: 38472491 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08542-y.


Assessment of Preoperative Predictors for Difficult Laryngeal Exposure in Endolaryngeal Surgery.

Nautiyal S, Kumar Agarwal V, Bist S, Kumar L, Luthra M Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 76(1):490-494.

PMID: 38440588 PMC: 10908999. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-04190-6.

References
1.
Nichol H, Zuck D . Difficult laryngoscopy--the "anterior" larynx and the atlanto-occipital gap. Br J Anaesth. 1983; 55(2):141-4. DOI: 10.1093/bja/55.2.141. View

2.
Windfuhr J, Remmert S . Intubation laryngeal mask: atraumatic diagnostic tool in suspension laryngoscopy. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005; 125(1):100-7. DOI: 10.1080/00016480410015802. View

3.
Roh J, Lee Y . Prediction of difficult laryngeal exposure in patients undergoing microlaryngosurgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005; 114(8):614-20. DOI: 10.1177/000348940511400806. View

4.
Hsiung M, Pai L, Kang B, Wang B, Wong C, Wang H . Clinical predictors of difficult laryngeal exposure. Laryngoscope. 2004; 114(2):358-63. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200402000-00033. View

5.
Paul R, Varghese A, Mathew J, Chandrasekharan R, Amalanathan S, Asif S . Difficult Laryngeal Exposure in Microlaryngoscopy: Can it be Predicted Preoperatively?. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 68(1):65-70. PMC: 4809832. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-015-0913-9. View