Can the Greulich and Pyle Method Be Used on French Contemporary Individuals?

Overview

Journal Int J Legal Med

Specialty Forensic Sciences

Date 2014 Jun 6

PMID 24898190

Citations 15

Authors

Donca Zabet

Camille Rerolle

Julien Pucheux

Norbert Telmon

Pauline Saint-Martin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Forensic age estimation of living individuals has become increasingly important in forensic practice with the constant increase of migration movements to developed countries. The method of Greulich and Pyle is one of the most frequently used methods for age determination. The aim of our study was to verify the reliability of this method on a French contemporary population. We retrospectively analyzed 190 frontal hand and wrist radiographs of living subjects aged between 10 and 19 years (100 males and 90 females) performed in the Radiology Department of the University Hospital of Tours. These radiographs were compared with the Greulich and Pyle atlas to determine the skeletal age (SA) and to compare it to the chronological age (CA). We calculated the coefficient of correlation and the coefficient of determination for each sex group. The SA of our subjects was also inserted in the graphs provided by Greulich and Pyle in their atlas. Intra- and inter-observer variabilities were good, demonstrating the reproducibility and repeatability of the method. The correlation coefficients were high (0.98 for males and 0.93 for females) and comparable with published data. The mean difference between CA and SA was -2.29 months for males and -6.44 months for females, showing an overestimation of CA for both sexes. No statistical difference was found between CA and SA for both male and female samples. We concluded that the method of Greulich and Pyle can be used on a contemporary French population but not without caution because of a tendency for this method to overestimate age. A fully developed hand and wrist does not allow to state that the 18th year of life is completed beyond a reasonable doubt. We recommend using it in association with other methods.

Citing Articles

The Validation of the Greulich and Pyle Atlas for Radiological Bone Age Assessments in a Pediatric Population from the Canary Islands.

Martin Perez I, Martin Perez S, Vega Gonzalez J, Molina Suarez R, Garcia Hernandez A, Rodriguez Hernandez F Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(18).

PMID: 39337187 PMC: 11431523. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12181847.

A probability model for estimating age in young individuals relative to key legal thresholds: 15, 18 or 21-year.

Heldring N, Rezaie A, Larsson A, Gahn R, Zilg B, Camilleri S Int J Legal Med. 2024; 139(1):197-217.

PMID: 39292274 PMC: 11732925. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-024-03324-x.

Precision and Accuracy of Radiological Bone Age Assessment in Children among Different Ethnic Groups: A Systematic Review.

Martin Perez S, Martin Perez I, Vega Gonzalez J, Molina Suarez R, Leon Hernandez C, Rodriguez Hernandez F Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(19).

PMID: 37835867 PMC: 10572703. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13193124.

Greulich and Pyle atlas: a non-reliable skeletal maturity assessment method in the North Indian population.

Tiwari P, Nayak A, Verma A, Pandey S, Mishra A, Devadas D Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2023; 20(1):106-116.

PMID: 37071347 DOI: 10.1007/s12024-023-00607-4.

Comparison of Bone Age Assessments by Gruelich-Pyle, Gilsanz-Ratib, and Tanner Whitehouse Methods in Healthy Indian Children.

Shah N, Khadilkar V, Lohiya N, Prasad H, Patil P, Gondhalekar K Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2021; 25(3):240-246.

PMID: 34760680 PMC: 8547392. DOI: 10.4103/ijem.IJEM_826_20.

References

Schmeling A, Olze A, Reisinger W, Geserick G . Age estimation of living people undergoing criminal proceedings. Lancet. 2001; 358(9276):89-90. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05379-X. View

Kellinghaus M, Schulz R, Vieth V, Schmidt S, Schmeling A . Forensic age estimation in living subjects based on the ossification status of the medial clavicular epiphysis as revealed by thin-slice multidetector computed tomography. Int J Legal Med. 2009; 124(2):149-54. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-009-0398-8. View

Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Loreck D, Vendura K, Markus W, Geserick G . Effects of ethnicity on skeletal maturation: consequences for forensic age estimations. Int J Legal Med. 2000; 113(5):253-8. DOI: 10.1007/s004149900102. View

Garamendi P, Landa M, Ballesteros J, Solano M . Reliability of the methods applied to assess age minority in living subjects around 18 years old. A survey on a Moroccan origin population. Forensic Sci Int. 2005; 154(1):3-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.08.018. View

Lynnerup N, Belard E, Buch-Olsen K, Sejrsen B, Damgaard-Pedersen K . Intra- and interobserver error of the Greulich-Pyle method as used on a Danish forensic sample. Forensic Sci Int. 2008; 179(2-3):242.e1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.05.005. View

Schmeling A, Grundmann C, Fuhrmann A, Kaatsch H, Knell B, Ramsthaler F . Criteria for age estimation in living individuals. Int J Legal Med. 2008; 122(6):457-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-008-0254-2. View

Schmeling A, Schulz R, Danner B, Rosing F . The impact of economic progress and modernization in medicine on the ossification of hand and wrist. Int J Legal Med. 2005; 120(2):121-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-005-0007-4. View

Patil S, Parchand M, Meshram M, Kamdi N . Applicability of Greulich and Pyle skeletal age standards to Indian children. Forensic Sci Int. 2011; 216(1-3):200.e1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.09.022. View

Groell R, Lindbichler F, Riepl T, Gherra L, Roposch A, Fotter R . The reliability of bone age determination in central European children using the Greulich and Pyle method. Br J Radiol. 1999; 72(857):461-4. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.72.857.10505010. View

10.

Wittschieber D, Schulz R, Vieth V, Kuppers M, Bajanowski T, Ramsthaler F . The value of sub-stages and thin slices for the assessment of the medial clavicular epiphysis: a prospective multi-center CT study. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013; 10(2):163-9. DOI: 10.1007/s12024-013-9511-x. View

11.

Schmeling A, Olze A, Reisinger W, Geserick G . Forensic age estimation and ethnicity. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2005; 7(2):134-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2004.07.004. View

12.

Schmidt S, Koch B, Schulz R, Reisinger W, Schmeling A . Comparative analysis of the applicability of the skeletal age determination methods of Greulich-Pyle and Thiemann-Nitz for forensic age estimation in living subjects. Int J Legal Med. 2007; 121(4):293-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-007-0165-7. View

13.

Tanner J, Oshman D, Bahhage F, Healy M . Tanner-Whitehouse bone age reference values for North American children. J Pediatr. 1997; 131(1 Pt 1):34-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)90000-7. View

14.

Kellinghaus M, Schulz R, Vieth V, Schmidt S, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A . Enhanced possibilities to make statements on the ossification status of the medial clavicular epiphysis using an amplified staging scheme in evaluating thin-slice CT scans. Int J Legal Med. 2010; 124(4):321-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-010-0448-2. View

15.

Cantekin K, Celikoglu M, Miloglu O, Dane A, Erdem A . Bone age assessment: the applicability of the Greulich-Pyle method in eastern Turkish children. J Forensic Sci. 2012; 57(3):679-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.02035.x. View

16.

Moradi M, Sirous M, Morovatti P . The reliability of skeletal age determination in an Iranian sample using Greulich and Pyle method. Forensic Sci Int. 2012; 223(1-3):372.e1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.08.030. View

17.

Loder R, Estle D, Morrison K, Eggleston D, Fish D, Greenfield M . Applicability of the Greulich and Pyle skeletal age standards to black and white children of today. Am J Dis Child. 1993; 147(12):1329-33. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160360071022. View

18.

Hackman L, Black S . The reliability of the Greulich and Pyle atlas when applied to a modern Scottish population. J Forensic Sci. 2012; 58(1):114-9. PMC: 3781705. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02294.x. View

19.

Schmidt S, Nitz I, Ribbecke S, Schulz R, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A . Skeletal age determination of the hand: a comparison of methods. Int J Legal Med. 2013; 127(3):691-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-013-0845-4. View

20.

Buken B, Erzengin O, Buken E, Safak A, Yazici B, Erkol Z . Comparison of the three age estimation methods: which is more reliable for Turkish children?. Forensic Sci Int. 2008; 183(1-3):103.e1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.10.012. View