The Utility of Ultrasonographic Bone Age Determination in Detecting Growth Disturbances; a Comparative Study with the Conventional Radiographic Technique

Overview

Journal Skeletal Radiol

Specialties Orthopedics
Radiology

Date 2015 May 31

PMID 26025121

Citations 3

Authors

Parisa Hajalioghli

Mohammad Kazem Tarzamni

Sara Arami

Daniel Fadaei Fouladi

Morteza Ghojazadeh

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To test whether the conventional radiographic technique in determining bone age abnormalities can be replaced by ultrasonography.

Materials And Methods: A total of 54 Caucasian subjects up to 7 years of age with clinically suspected growth problems underwent left hand and wrist radiographic and ultrasonographic bone age estimations with the use of the Greulich-Pyle atlas. The ultrasonographic scans targeted the ossification centers in the radius and ulna distal epiphysis, carpal bones, epiphyses of the first and third metacarpals, and epiphysis of the middle phalanx, as described in previous reports. The degree of agreement between the two sets of data, as well as the accuracy of the ultrasonographic method in detecting radiographically suggested bone age abnormities, was examined.

Results: The mean chronological age, radiographic bone age, and ultrasonographic bone age (all in months) were 41.96 ± 22.25, 26.68 ± 14.08, and 26.71 ± 13.50 in 28 boys and 43.62 ± 24.63, 30.12 ± 17.69, and 31.27 ± 18.06 in 26 girls, respectively. According to the Bland-Altman plot there was high agreement between the results of the two methods with only three outliers. The deviations in bone age from the chronological age taken by the two techniques had the same sign in all patients. Supposing radiography to be the method of reference, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of sonography in detecting growth abnormalities were all 100% in males and 90.9, 100, 100, and 93.8%, respectively, in females.

Conclusion: The conventional radiographic technique for determining bone age abnormalities could be replaced by ultrasonography.

Citing Articles

Bone age assessment based on three-dimensional ultrasound and artificial intelligence compared with paediatrician-read radiographic bone age: protocol for a prospective, diagnostic accuracy study.

Chen L, Zeng B, Shen J, Xu J, Cai Z, Su S BMJ Open. 2024; 14(2):e079969.

PMID: 38401893 PMC: 10895244. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079969.

Ultrasonography in determining pubertal growth and bone age.

Torenek Agirman K, Bilge O, Miloglu O Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018; 47(7):20170398.

PMID: 29668314 PMC: 6196061. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20170398.

Dental and Skeletal Age Estimations in Lebanese Children: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study.

Saade A, Baron P, Noujeim Z, Azar D J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017; 7(3):90-97.

PMID: 28584777 PMC: 5452572. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_139_17.

References

Buken B, Safak A, Yazici B, Buken E, Mayda A . Is the assessment of bone age by the Greulich-Pyle method reliable at forensic age estimation for Turkish children?. Forensic Sci Int. 2007; 173(2-3):146-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.02.023. View

Horter M, Friesen S, Wacker S, Vogt B, Leidiger B, Roedl R . [Determination of skeletal age : comparison of the methods of Greulich and Pyle and Tanner and Whitehouse]. Orthopade. 2012; 41(12):966-76. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-012-1983-y. View

Wagner U, Diedrich V, Schmitt O . Determination of skeletal maturity by ultrasound: a preliminary report. Skeletal Radiol. 1995; 24(6):417-20. DOI: 10.1007/BF00941236. View

Koc A, Karaoglanoglu M, Erdogan M, Kosecik M, Cesur Y . Assessment of bone ages: is the Greulich-Pyle method sufficient for Turkish boys?. Pediatr Int. 2001; 43(6):662-5. DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-200x.2001.01470.x. View

Zhang A, Sayre J, Vachon L, Liu B, Huang H . Racial differences in growth patterns of children assessed on the basis of bone age. Radiology. 2008; 250(1):228-35. PMC: 2817832. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2493080468. View

Castriota-Scanderbeg A, Sacco M, Fraracci L . Skeletal age assessment in children and young adults: comparison between a newly developed sonographic method and conventional methods. Skeletal Radiol. 1998; 27(5):271-7. DOI: 10.1007/s002560050380. View

Nessi R, Garattini G, Bazzini E, Zaffaroni R, Lazzerini F . [Ultrasonography assessment of ossification foci of the wrist and pubertal growth spurt]. Radiol Med. 1997; 94(1-2):43-6. View

Kreitner K, Schweden F, Riepert T, Nafe B, Thelen M . Bone age determination based on the study of the medial extremity of the clavicle. Eur Radiol. 1998; 8(7):1116-22. DOI: 10.1007/s003300050518. View

Patil S, Parchand M, Meshram M, Kamdi N . Applicability of Greulich and Pyle skeletal age standards to Indian children. Forensic Sci Int. 2011; 216(1-3):200.e1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.09.022. View

10.

Hackman L, Black S . The reliability of the Greulich and Pyle atlas when applied to a modern Scottish population. J Forensic Sci. 2012; 58(1):114-9. PMC: 3781705. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02294.x. View

11.

Zabet D, Rerolle C, Pucheux J, Telmon N, Saint-Martin P . Can the Greulich and Pyle method be used on French contemporary individuals?. Int J Legal Med. 2014; 129(1):171-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-014-1028-7. View

12.

Khan K, Sarafoglou K, Somani A, Frohnert B, Miller B . Can ultrasound be used to estimate bone mineral density in children with growth problems?. Acta Paediatr. 2013; 102(9):e407-12. PMC: 4886708. DOI: 10.1111/apa.12314. View

13.

Mentzel H, Vilser C, Eulenstein M, Schwartz T, Vogt S, Bottcher J . Assessment of skeletal age at the wrist in children with a new ultrasound device. Pediatr Radiol. 2005; 35(4):429-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-004-1385-3. View

14.

Carpenter C, Lester E . Skeletal age determination in young children: analysis of three regions of the hand/wrist film. J Pediatr Orthop. 1993; 13(1):76-9. DOI: 10.1097/01241398-199301000-00015. View

15.

Khan K, Miller B, Hoggard E, Somani A, Sarafoglou K . Application of ultrasound for bone age estimation in clinical practice. J Pediatr. 2008; 154(2):243-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.08.018. View

16.

Daneff M, Casalis C, Bruno C, Bruno D . Bone age assessment with conventional ultrasonography in healthy infants from 1 to 24 months of age. Pediatr Radiol. 2015; 45(7):1007-15. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-014-3253-0. View

17.

van Rijn R, Lequin M, Robben S, Hop W, van Kuijk C . Is the Greulich and Pyle atlas still valid for Dutch Caucasian children today?. Pediatr Radiol. 2001; 31(10):748-52. DOI: 10.1007/s002470100531. View

18.

Mansourvar M, Ismail M, Raj R, Kareem S, Aik S, Gunalan R . The applicability of Greulich and Pyle atlas to assess skeletal age for four ethnic groups. J Forensic Leg Med. 2014; 22:26-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.11.011. View

19.

Moradi M, Sirous M, Morovatti P . The reliability of skeletal age determination in an Iranian sample using Greulich and Pyle method. Forensic Sci Int. 2012; 223(1-3):372.e1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.08.030. View

20.

Bilgili Y, Hizel S, Kara S, Sanli C, Erdal H, Altinok D . Accuracy of skeletal age assessment in children from birth to 6 years of age with the ultrasonographic version of the Greulich-Pyle atlas. J Ultrasound Med. 2003; 22(7):683-90. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2003.22.7.683. View