Forensic Use of the Greulich and Pyle Atlas: Prediction Intervals and Relevance

Overview

Journal Eur Radiol

Specialty Radiology

Date 2016 Jul 1

PMID 27357132

Citations 14

Authors

K Chaumoitre

B Saliba-Serre

P Adalian

M Signoli

G Leonetti

M Panuel

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: The Greulich and Pyle (GP) atlas is one of the most frequently used methods of bone age (BA) estimation. Our aim is to assess its accuracy and to calculate the prediction intervals at 95% for forensic use.

Methods: The study was conducted on a multi-ethnic sample of 2614 individuals (1423 boys and 1191 girls) referred to the university hospital of Marseille (France) for simple injuries. Hand radiographs were analysed using the GP atlas. Reliability of GP atlas and agreement between BA and chronological age (CA) were assessed and prediction intervals at 95% were calculated.

Results: The repeatability was excellent and the reproducibility was good. Pearson's linear correlation coefficient between CA and BA was 0.983. The mean difference between BA and CA was -0.18 years (boys) and 0.06 years (girls). The prediction interval at 95% for CA was given for each GP category and ranged between 1.2 and more than 4.5 years.

Conclusion: The GP atlas is a reproducible and repeatable method that is still accurate for the present population, with a high correlation between BA and CA. The prediction intervals at 95% are wide, reflecting individual variability, and should be known when the method is used in forensic cases.

Key Points: • The GP atlas is still accurate at the present time. • There is a high correlation between bone age and chronological age. • Individual variability must be known when GP is used in forensic cases. • Prediction intervals (95%) are large; around 4 years after 10 year olds.

Citing Articles

A probability model for estimating age in young individuals relative to key legal thresholds: 15, 18 or 21-year.

Heldring N, Rezaie A, Larsson A, Gahn R, Zilg B, Camilleri S Int J Legal Med. 2024; 139(1):197-217.

PMID: 39292274 PMC: 11732925. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-024-03324-x.

Performance of two different artificial intelligence (AI) methods for assessing carpal bone age compared to the standard Greulich and Pyle method.

Alaimo D, Terranova M, Palizzolo E, De Angelis M, Avella V, Paviglianiti G Radiol Med. 2024; 129(10):1507-1512.

PMID: 39162939 PMC: 11480116. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01871-2.

Reliability of Two Recently Developed Procedures Assessing Biological Maturity by Ultrasound Imaging-A Pilot Study.

Hutmacher N, Busch J, Rueger E, Romann M, Eichelberger P Children (Basel). 2024; 11(3).

PMID: 38539360 PMC: 10968870. DOI: 10.3390/children11030326.

Precision and Accuracy of Radiological Bone Age Assessment in Children among Different Ethnic Groups: A Systematic Review.

Martin Perez S, Martin Perez I, Vega Gonzalez J, Molina Suarez R, Leon Hernandez C, Rodriguez Hernandez F Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(19).

PMID: 37835867 PMC: 10572703. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13193124.

Forensic age estimation in living children: how accurate is the Greulich-Pyle method in Sabah, East Malaysia?.

Nang K, Ismail A, Tangaperumal A, Wynn A, Thein T, Hayati F Front Pediatr. 2023; 11:1137960.

PMID: 37397141 PMC: 10308217. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1137960.

References

Acheson R, Fowler G, Fry E, Janes M, Koski K, Urbano P . STUDIES IN THE RELIABILITY OF ASSESSING SKELETAL MATURITY FROM X-RAYS. I. GREULICH-PYLE ATLAS. Hum Biol. 1963; 35:317-49. View

Peritz E, Sproul A . Some aspects of the analysis of hand-wrist bone-age readings. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1971; 35(3):441-7. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330350324. View

FORBES A, Ronaghy H, Majd M . Skeletal maturation of children in Shiraz, Iran. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1971; 35(3):449-54. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330350325. View

Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Loreck D, Vendura K, Markus W, Geserick G . Effects of ethnicity on skeletal maturation: consequences for forensic age estimations. Int J Legal Med. 2000; 113(5):253-8. DOI: 10.1007/s004149900102. View

Lin F, Zhang J, Zhu Z, Wu Y . Comparative study of Gilsanz-Ratib digital atlas and Greulich-Pyle atlas for bone age estimation in a Chinese sample. Ann Hum Biol. 2014; 42(6):523-7. DOI: 10.3109/03014460.2014.977346. View

King D, Steventon D, OSullivan M, Cook A, Hornsby V, Jefferson I . Reproducibility of bone ages when performed by radiology registrars: an audit of Tanner and Whitehouse II versus Greulich and Pyle methods. Br J Radiol. 1994; 67(801):848-51. DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-801-848. View

Hackman L, Black S . Does mirror imaging a radiograph affect reliability of age assessment using the Greulich and Pyle atlas?. J Forensic Sci. 2012; 57(5):1276-80. PMC: 3781704. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02150.x. View

Cantekin K, Celikoglu M, Miloglu O, Dane A, Erdem A . Bone age assessment: the applicability of the Greulich-Pyle method in eastern Turkish children. J Forensic Sci. 2012; 57(3):679-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.02035.x. View

Schmidt S, Nitz I, Ribbecke S, Schulz R, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A . Skeletal age determination of the hand: a comparison of methods. Int J Legal Med. 2013; 127(3):691-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-013-0845-4. View

10.

Malina R, Himes J, Stepick C . Skeletal maturity of the hand and wrist in Oaxaca school children. Ann Hum Biol. 1976; 3(3):211-9. DOI: 10.1080/03014467600001371. View

11.

Serinelli S, Panetta V, Pasqualetti P, Marchetti D . Accuracy of three age determination X-ray methods on the left hand-wrist: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2011; 13(3):120-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2011.01.004. View

12.

Lewis C, Lavy C, Harrison W . Delay in skeletal maturity in Malawian children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(5):732-4. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b5.12642. View

13.

Kaplowitz P, Srinivasan S, He J, McCarter R, Hayeri M, Sze R . Comparison of bone age readings by pediatric endocrinologists and pediatric radiologists using two bone age atlases. Pediatr Radiol. 2010; 41(6):690-3. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-010-1915-0. View

14.

Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

15.

Zhang A, Sayre J, Vachon L, Liu B, Huang H . Racial differences in growth patterns of children assessed on the basis of bone age. Radiology. 2008; 250(1):228-35. PMC: 2817832. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2493080468. View

16.

Soudack M, Ben-Shlush A, Jacobson J, Raviv-Zilka L, Eshed I, Hamiel O . Bone age in the 21st century: is Greulich and Pyle's atlas accurate for Israeli children?. Pediatr Radiol. 2012; 42(3):343-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-011-2302-1. View

17.

Chaumoitre K, Lamtali S, Baali A, Saliba-Serre B, Lahmam A, Aboussad A . Influence of socioeconomic status and body mass index on bone age. Horm Res Paediatr. 2010; 74(2):129-35. DOI: 10.1159/000313371. View

18.

De Donno A, Santoro V, Lubelli S, Marrone M, Lozito P, Introna F . Age assessment using the Greulich and Pyle method on a heterogeneous sample of 300 Italian healthy and pathologic subjects. Forensic Sci Int. 2013; 229(1-3):157.e1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.03.002. View

19.

Mughal A, Hassan N, Ahmed A . The applicability of the Greulich & Pyle Atlas for bone age assessment in primary school-going children of Karachi, Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2014; 30(2):409-11. PMC: 3999020. View

20.

Kristmundsdottir F, Burwell R, Marshall W, Small P . Cross-sectional study of skeletal maturation in normal children from Nottingham and London. Ann Hum Biol. 1984; 11(2):133-9. DOI: 10.1080/03014468400006981. View