» Articles » PMID: 24889621

Single-cell Nucleosome Mapping Reveals the Molecular Basis of Gene Expression Heterogeneity

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2014 Jun 4
PMID 24889621
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nucleosomes, the basic unit of chromatin, have a critical role in the control of gene expression. Nucleosome positions have generally been determined by examining bulk populations of cells and then correlated with overall gene expression. Here, we describe a technique to determine nucleosome positioning in single cells by virtue of the ability of the nucleosome to protect DNA from GpC methylation. In the acid phosphatase inducible PHO5 gene, we find that there is significant cell-to-cell variation in nucleosome positions and shifts in nucleosome positioning correlate with changes in gene expression. However, nucleosome positioning is not absolute, and even with major shifts in gene expression, some cells fail to change nucleosome configuration. Mutations of the PHO5 promoter that introduce a poly(dA:dT) tract-stimulated gene expression under nonpermissive conditions led to shifts of positioned nucleosomes similar to induction of PHO5. By contrast, mutations that altered AA/TT/AT periodicity reduced gene expression upon PHO5 induction and stabilized nucleosomes in most cells, suggesting that enhanced nucleosome affinity for DNA antagonizes chromatin remodelers. Finally, we determined nucleosome positioning in two regions described as "fuzzy" or nucleosome-free when examined in a bulk assay. These regions consisted of distinct nucleosomes with a larger footprint for potential location and an increase population of cells lacking a nucleosome altogether. These data indicate an underlying complexity of nucleosome positioning that may contribute to the flexibility and heterogeneity of gene expression.

Citing Articles

Linking DNA-packing density distribution and TAD boundary locations.

Meng L, Sheong F, Luo Q Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(9):e2418456122.

PMID: 39999165 PMC: 11892626. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2418456122.


The impact of phenotypic heterogeneity on fungal pathogenicity and drug resistance.

Kozubowski L, Berman J FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2025; 49.

PMID: 39809571 PMC: 11756289. DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuaf001.


Examining chromatin heterogeneity through PacBio long-read sequencing of M.EcoGII methylated genomes: an m6A detection efficiency and calling bias correcting pipeline.

Dennis A, Xu Z, Clark D Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 52(9):e45.

PMID: 38634798 PMC: 11109960. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae288.


Examining chromatin heterogeneity through PacBio long-read sequencing of M.EcoGII methylated genomes: an mA detection efficiency and calling bias correcting pipeline.

Dennis A, Xu Z, Clark D bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 38076871 PMC: 10705563. DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.28.569045.


Old and newly synthesized histones are asymmetrically distributed in Drosophila intestinal stem cell divisions.

Zion E, Ringwalt D, Rinaldi K, Kahney E, Li Y, Chen X EMBO Rep. 2023; 24(7):e56404.

PMID: 37255015 PMC: 10328082. DOI: 10.15252/embr.202256404.


References
1.
Thastrom A, Lowary P, Widlund H, Cao H, Kubista M, Widom J . Sequence motifs and free energies of selected natural and non-natural nucleosome positioning DNA sequences. J Mol Biol. 1999; 288(2):213-29. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2686. View

2.
Okuwaki M, Verreault A . Maintenance DNA methylation of nucleosome core particles. J Biol Chem. 2003; 279(4):2904-12. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M310111200. View

3.
Struhl K, Segal E . Determinants of nucleosome positioning. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013; 20(3):267-73. PMC: 3740156. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2506. View

4.
Kim H, OShea E . A quantitative model of transcription factor-activated gene expression. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008; 15(11):1192-8. PMC: 2696132. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1500. View

5.
Wasson T, Hartemink A . An ensemble model of competitive multi-factor binding of the genome. Genome Res. 2009; 19(11):2101-12. PMC: 2775586. DOI: 10.1101/gr.093450.109. View