Non-enhanced T1-weighted Liver Vessel Imaging at 7 Tesla

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2014 Jun 3

PMID 24887206

Citations 3

Authors

Anja Fischer

Oliver Kraff

Stefan Maderwald

Karsten Beiderwellen

Mark E Ladd

Michael Forsting

Thomas C Lauenstein

Lale Umutlu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Aim of the study was to assess the feasibility and to compare three non-enhanced T1-weighted (w) sequences for liver vessel imaging at 7 Tesla (T).

Material And Methods: 12 healthy volunteers were examined on a 7 T whole-body MR-system. The following non-enhanced sequences were acquired: T1w 2D FLASH, T1w 3D FLASH and Time of flight (TOF)-MRA. Qualitative image analysis was performed by two radiologists including over all image quality as well as vessel delineation of the liver arteries, liver veins and portal vein and the presence of artifacts using a five-point scale (5 = excellent vessel delineation to 1 = non-diagnostic). Contrast ratios (CR), SNR und CNR of the above named vessels in correlation to adjacent liver tissue were calculated for quantitative assessment. For statistical analysis, a Wilcoxon Rank Test was applied.

Results: All three sequences provided a homogenous hyperintense delineation of the assessed liver vessels. Qualitative image analysis demonstrated the superiority of TOF-MRA, providing best overall image quality (TOF 4.17, 2D FLASH 3.42, 3D FLASH 3.46; p<0.01) as well as highest image quality values for all analyzed liver vessel segments. TOF-MRA was least impaired by B1 inhomogeneity (4.13) and susceptibility artifacts (4.63) out of all three sequences (p<0.01). Quantitative image analysis confirmed the superiority of TOF MRA showing significant higher CR values for all liver vessels (e.g. right hepatic artery TOF 0.47, 2D FLASH 0.09, 3D FLASH 0.11 with p = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). Providing the lowest standard deviation in noise, TOF showed highest values for SNR and CNR.

Conclusions: Non-enhanced T1w imaging in general and TOF MRA in particular, appear to be promising techniques for high quality non-enhanced liver vessel assessment at 7 T.

Citing Articles

From strength to precision: A systematic review exploring the clinical utility of 7-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in abdominal imaging.

Perera Molligoda Arachchige A, Teixeira de Castro Goncalves Ortega A, Catapano F, Politi L, Hoff M World J Radiol. 2024; 16(1):20-31.

PMID: 38312348 PMC: 10835428. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i1.20.

Evolution of UHF Body Imaging in the Human Torso at 7T: Technology, Applications, and Future Directions.

Erturk M, Li X, Van de Moortele P, Ugurbil K, Metzger G Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2019; 28(3):101-124.

PMID: 31188271 PMC: 6587233. DOI: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000202.

Parallel transmission for ultrahigh-field imaging.

Padormo F, Beqiri A, Hajnal J, Malik S NMR Biomed. 2015; 29(9):1145-61.

PMID: 25989904 PMC: 4995736. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3313.

References

Sahani D, Mehta A, Blake M, Prasad S, Harris G, Saini S . Preoperative hepatic vascular evaluation with CT and MR angiography: implications for surgery. Radiographics. 2004; 24(5):1367-80. DOI: 10.1148/rg.245035224. View

Duan Q, van Gelderen P, Duyn J . Improved Bloch-Siegert based B1 mapping by reducing off-resonance shift. NMR Biomed. 2013; 26(9):1070-8. PMC: 3669656. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.2920. View

Grobner T . Gadolinium--a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis?. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006; 21(4):1104-8. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfk062. View

Lee M, Lee J, Lee J, Kim S, Park E, Han J . Preoperative evaluation of hepatic arterial and portal venous anatomy using the time resolved echo-shared MR angiographic technique in living liver donors. Eur Radiol. 2006; 17(4):1074-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0447-3. View

Uchida K, Taniguchi M, Shimamura T, Suzuki T, Yamashita K, Ota M . Three-dimensional computed tomography scan analysis of hepatic vasculatures in the donor liver for living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2010; 16(9):1062-8. DOI: 10.1002/lt.22109. View

Saba L, Mallarini G . Multidetector row CT angiography in the evaluation of the hepatic artery and its anatomical variants. Clin Radiol. 2008; 63(3):312-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2007.05.023. View

Shimada K, Isoda H, Okada T, Kamae T, Maetani Y, Arizono S . Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography for selective visualization of the hepatic vein and inferior vena cava with true steady-state free-precession sequence and time-spatial labeling inversion pulses: preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009; 29(2):474-9. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21636. View

Umutlu L, Kraff O, Orzada S, Fischer A, Kinner S, Maderwald S . Dynamic contrast-enhanced renal MRI at 7 Tesla: preliminary results. Invest Radiol. 2011; 46(7):425-33. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31820e1467. View

Shimada K, Isoda H, Okada T, Kamae T, Arizono S, Hirokawa Y . Unenhanced MR portography with a half-Fourier fast spin-echo sequence and time-space labeling inversion pulses: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193(1):106-12. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1626. View

10.

Umutlu L, Bitz A, Maderwald S, Orzada S, Kinner S, Kraff O . Contrast-enhanced ultra-high-field liver MRI: a feasibility trial. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 82(5):760-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.07.004. View

11.

Moser E, Stahlberg F, Ladd M, Trattnig S . 7-T MR--from research to clinical applications?. NMR Biomed. 2011; 25(5):695-716. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1794. View

12.

Lee M, Lee J, Lee J, Kim S, Park E, Han J . Preoperative evaluation of the hepatic vascular anatomy in living liver donors: comparison of CT angiography and MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006; 24(5):1081-7. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20726. View

13.

Ramalho M, Altun E, Heredia V, Zapparoli M, Semelka R . Liver MR imaging: 1.5T versus 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2007; 15(3):321-47, vi. DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2007.06.003. View

14.

Shimada K, Isoda H, Okada T, Maetani Y, Arizono S, Hirokawa Y . Non-contrast-enhanced hepatic MR angiography with true steady-state free-precession and time spatial labeling inversion pulse: optimization of the technique and preliminary results. Eur J Radiol. 2008; 70(1):111-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.12.010. View

15.

Bernstein M, Huston 3rd J, Ward H . Imaging artifacts at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006; 24(4):735-46. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20698. View

16.

Metzger G, Auerbach E, Akgun C, Simonson J, Bi X, Ugurbil K . Dynamically applied B1+ shimming solutions for non-contrast enhanced renal angiography at 7.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2012; 69(1):114-26. PMC: 3387512. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24237. View

17.

Carr J, Nemcek Jr A, Abecassis M, Blei A, Clarke L, Pereles F . Preoperative evaluation of the entire hepatic vasculature in living liver donors with use of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and true fast imaging with steady-state precession. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003; 14(4):441-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000064853.87207.42. View

18.

Monninghoff C, Maderwald S, Theysohn J, Kraff O, Ladd S, Ladd M . Evaluation of intracranial aneurysms with 7 T versus 1.5 T time-of-flight MR angiography - initial experience. Rofo. 2008; 181(1):16-23. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027863. View

19.

Streitparth F, Pech M, Figolska S, Denecke T, Grieser C, Pascher A . Living related liver transplantation: preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of hepatic vasculature of donor candidates. Acta Radiol. 2007; 48(1):20-6. DOI: 10.1080/02841850601045146. View

20.

Wrede K, Dammann P, Monninghoff C, Johst S, Maderwald S, Sandalcioglu I . Non-enhanced MR imaging of cerebral aneurysms: 7 Tesla versus 1.5 Tesla. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e84562. PMC: 3882245. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084562. View