» Articles » PMID: 24771618

Evaluation of Early Weight Loss Thresholds for Identifying Nonresponders to an Intensive Lifestyle Intervention

Abstract

Objective: Weight losses in lifestyle interventions are variable, yet prediction of long-term success is difficult. The utility of using various weight loss thresholds in the first 2 months of treatment for predicting 1-year outcomes was examined.

Methods: Participants included 2327 adults with type 2 diabetes (BMI:35.8 ± 6.0) randomized to the intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) of the Look AHEAD trial. ILI included weekly behavioral sessions designed to increase physical activity and reduce caloric intake. 1-month, 2-month, and 1-year weight changes were calculated.

Results: Participants failing to achieve a ≥2% weight loss at Month 1 were 5.6 (95% CI:4.5, 7.0) times more likely to also not achieve a ≥10% weight loss at Year 1, compared to those losing ≥2% initially. These odds were increased to 11.6 (95% CI:8.6, 15.6) when using a 3% weight loss threshold at Month 2. Only 15.2% and 8.2% of individuals failing to achieve the ≥2% and ≥3% thresholds at Months 1 and 2, respectively, go on to achieve a ≥10% weight loss at Year 1.

Conclusions: Given the association between initial and 1-year weight loss, the first few months of treatment may be an opportune time to identify those who are unsuccessful and utilize rescue efforts.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00017953.

Citing Articles

Anti-obesity medication for weight loss in early nonresponders to behavioral treatment: a randomized controlled trial.

Tronieri J, Ghanbari E, Chevinsky J, LaFata E, Minnick A, Rajpal S Nat Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40055520 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-025-03556-3.


Results of a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial using counseling to augment a digital weight loss program.

Martinez C, Nezami B, Mayer-Davis E, Willis E, Gorin A, Tate D Obes Sci Pract. 2024; 10(6):e70018.

PMID: 39512729 PMC: 11541063. DOI: 10.1002/osp4.70018.


Impact of an Adaptive Worksite Diabetes Prevention Trial on Health Action Process Approach Outcomes Regarding Dietary Intake and Physical Activity.

King D, Miller C, Nagaraja H, Fujita K, Cheavens J Health Behav Res. 2024; 7(2).

PMID: 39430006 PMC: 11488647. DOI: 10.4148/2572-1836.1218.


Early and slow weight loss responders' perceptions of an adaptive diabetes prevention trial: A qualitative perspective.

King D, Miller C, Cheavens J, Fujita K Health Educ J. 2024; 82(7):807-819.

PMID: 39329049 PMC: 11423868. DOI: 10.1177/00178969231198956.


Exploring Determinants of Successful Weight Loss with the Use of a Smartphone Healthcare Application: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Shi Y, Sasaki Y, Ishimura K, Mizuno S, Nakata Y Nutrients. 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 38999857 PMC: 11243466. DOI: 10.3390/nu16132108.


References
1.
Wing R, Hamman R, Bray G, Delahanty L, Edelstein S, Hill J . Achieving weight and activity goals among diabetes prevention program lifestyle participants. Obes Res. 2004; 12(9):1426-34. PMC: 2505058. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2004.179. View

2.
Nackers L, Ross K, Perri M . The association between rate of initial weight loss and long-term success in obesity treatment: does slow and steady win the race?. Int J Behav Med. 2010; 17(3):161-7. PMC: 3780395. DOI: 10.1007/s12529-010-9092-y. View

3.
Carels R, Wott C, Young K, Gumble A, Darby L, Oehlhof M . Successful weight loss with self-help: a stepped-care approach. J Behav Med. 2009; 32(6):503-9. PMC: 3533369. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-009-9221-8. View

4.
Blackburn G . Effect of degree of weight loss on health benefits. Obes Res. 1995; 3 Suppl 2:211s-216s. DOI: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1995.tb00466.x. View

5.
Elfhag K, Rossner S . Initial weight loss is the best predictor for success in obesity treatment and sociodemographic liabilities increase risk for drop-out. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 79(3):361-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.02.006. View