» Articles » PMID: 24706738

A Proposed Genus Boundary for the Prokaryotes Based on Genomic Insights

Overview
Journal J Bacteriol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2014 Apr 8
PMID 24706738
Citations 289
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genomic information has already been applied to prokaryotic species definition and classification. However, the contribution of the genome sequence to prokaryotic genus delimitation has been less studied. To gain insights into genus definition for the prokaryotes, we attempted to reveal the genus-level genomic differences in the current prokaryotic classification system and to delineate the boundary of a genus on the basis of genomic information. The average nucleotide sequence identity between two genomes can be used for prokaryotic species delineation, but it is not suitable for genus demarcation. We used the percentage of conserved proteins (POCP) between two strains to estimate their evolutionary and phenotypic distance. A comprehensive genomic survey indicated that the POCP can serve as a robust genomic index for establishing the genus boundary for prokaryotic groups. Basically, two species belonging to the same genus would share at least half of their proteins. In a specific lineage, the genus and family/order ranks showed slight or no overlap in terms of POCP values. A prokaryotic genus can be defined as a group of species with all pairwise POCP values higher than 50%. Integration of whole-genome data into the current taxonomy system can provide comprehensive information for prokaryotic genus definition and delimitation.

Citing Articles

Metabolic versatility and nitrate reduction pathways of a new thermophilic bacterium of the Deferrivibrionaceae: Deferrivibrio metallireducens sp. nov isolated from hot sediments of Vulcano Island, Italy.

Gales G, Hennart M, Hannoun M, Postec A, Erauso G PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0315093.

PMID: 40067810 PMC: 11896075. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315093.


In-Depth Genome-Based Analysis of Shigella spp. and Escherichia spp.: Resolving Ambiguities and Unveiling Phylogenetic Relationships.

Dif G, Djemouai N, Bouras N, Zitouni A Curr Microbiol. 2025; 82(4):170.

PMID: 40045049 DOI: 10.1007/s00284-025-04158-5.


Genome mining and metabolite profiling illuminate the taxonomy status and the cytotoxic activity of a mangrove-derived Microbacterium alkaliflavum sp. nov.

Hu W, Deng L, Huang Y, Wang X, Qing J, Zhu H BMC Microbiol. 2025; 25(1):103.

PMID: 40021979 PMC: 11869465. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-025-03801-2.


Genomic insights into Marinospirillum alkalitolerans sp. nov., a novel PHB producing bacterium from an Indian impact crater, and an emended description of family Oceanospirillaceae.

Joshi A, Thite S, Godbole D, Boruah D, Sindhu D, Prabhu A Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2025; 118(3):53.

PMID: 39928221 DOI: 10.1007/s10482-024-02059-4.


Metabolic redundancy and specialisation of novel sulfide-oxidizing Sulfurimonas and Sulfurovum along the brine-seawater interface of the Kebrit Deep.

Alamoudi R, Barozzi A, Michoud G, Van Goethem M, Odobel C, Chen Y Environ Microbiome. 2025; 20(1):19.

PMID: 39910644 PMC: 11800652. DOI: 10.1186/s40793-025-00669-7.


References
1.
Konstantinidis K, Tiedje J . Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol. 2005; 187(18):6258-64. PMC: 1236649. DOI: 10.1128/JB.187.18.6258-6264.2005. View

2.
Yarza P, Richter M, Peplies J, Euzeby J, Amann R, Schleifer K . The All-Species Living Tree project: a 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree of all sequenced type strains. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2008; 31(4):241-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2008.07.001. View

3.
Muse S . Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates. Mol Biol Evol. 1996; 13(1):105-14. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025549. View

4.
Collins M, Lawson P, Willems A, Cordoba J, Garcia P, Cai J . The phylogeny of the genus Clostridium: proposal of five new genera and eleven new species combinations. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1994; 44(4):812-26. DOI: 10.1099/00207713-44-4-812. View

5.
Rossello-Mora R, Amann R . The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2001; 25(1):39-67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2001.tb00571.x. View