Relating Ecological Diversity to Genetic Discontinuity Across Bacterial Species

Overview

Journal Genome Biol

Date 2025 Jan 10

PMID 39794865

Authors

Hemanoel Passarelli-Araujo

Thiago M Venancio

William P Hanage

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Genetic discontinuity represents abrupt breaks in genomic identity among species. Advances in genome sequencing have enhanced our ability to track and characterize genetic discontinuity in bacterial populations. However, exploring the degree to which bacterial diversity exists as a continuum or sorted into discrete and readily defined species remains a challenge in microbial ecology. Here, we aim to quantify the genetic discontinuity ( ) and investigate how this metric is related to ecology.

Results: We harness a dataset comprising 210,129 genomes to systematically explore genetic discontinuity patterns across several distantly related species, finding clear breakpoints which vary depending on the taxa in question. By delving into pangenome characteristics, we uncover a significant association between pangenome saturation and genetic discontinuity. Closed pangenomes are associated with more pronounced breaks, exemplified by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Additionally, through a machine learning approach, we detect key features such as gene conservation patterns and functional annotations that significantly impact genetic discontinuity prediction.

Conclusions: Our study clarifies bacterial genetic patterns and their ecological impacts, enhancing the delineation of species boundaries and deepening our understanding of microbial diversity.

References

Soucy S, Huang J, Gogarten J . Horizontal gene transfer: building the web of life. Nat Rev Genet. 2015; 16(8):472-82. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3962. View

Raghavan U, Albert R, Kumara S . Near linear time algorithm to detect community structures in large-scale networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007; 76(3 Pt 2):036106. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.036106. View

Jain C, Rodriguez-R L, Phillippy A, Konstantinidis K, Aluru S . High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):5114. PMC: 6269478. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9. View

Parks D, Chuvochina M, Waite D, Rinke C, Skarshewski A, Chaumeil P . A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol. 2018; 36(10):996-1004. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4229. View

Criscuolo A, Gribaldo S . BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): a new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evol Biol. 2010; 10:210. PMC: 3017758. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-210. View

Rodriguez-R L, Conrad R, Viver T, Feistel D, Lindner B, Venter S . An ANI gap within bacterial species that advances the definitions of intra-species units. mBio. 2023; 15(1):e0269623. PMC: 10790751. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02696-23. View

Stelzner K, Vollmuth N, Rudel T . Intracellular lifestyle of Chlamydia trachomatis and host-pathogen interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023; 21(7):448-462. DOI: 10.1038/s41579-023-00860-y. View

Shapiro B, Friedman J, Cordero O, Preheim S, Timberlake S, Szabo G . Population genomics of early events in the ecological differentiation of bacteria. Science. 2012; 336(6077):48-51. PMC: 3337212. DOI: 10.1126/science.1218198. View

Brockhurst M, Harrison E, Hall J, Richards T, McNally A, Maclean C . The Ecology and Evolution of Pangenomes. Curr Biol. 2019; 29(20):R1094-R1103. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.012. View

10.

Arnold B, Huang I, Hanage W . Horizontal gene transfer and adaptive evolution in bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021; 20(4):206-218. DOI: 10.1038/s41579-021-00650-4. View

11.

Passarelli-Araujo H, Franco G, Venancio T . Network analysis of ten thousand genomes shed light on Pseudomonas diversity and classification. Microbiol Res. 2021; 254:126919. DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2021.126919. View

12.

Seshadri R, Paulsen I, Eisen J, Read T, Nelson K, Nelson W . Complete genome sequence of the Q-fever pathogen Coxiella burnetii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(9):5455-60. PMC: 154366. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0931379100. View

13.

Tonkin-Hill G, MacAlasdair N, Ruis C, Weimann A, Horesh G, Lees J . Producing polished prokaryotic pangenomes with the Panaroo pipeline. Genome Biol. 2020; 21(1):180. PMC: 7376924. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-020-02090-4. View

14.

Hanage W, Fraser C, Spratt B . Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006; 361(1475):1917-27. PMC: 1764932. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1917. View

15.

Ondov B, Treangen T, Melsted P, Mallonee A, Bergman N, Koren S . Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. Genome Biol. 2016; 17(1):132. PMC: 4915045. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-016-0997-x. View

16.

Konstantinidis K, Tiedje J . Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(7):2567-72. PMC: 549018. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0409727102. View

17.

Passarelli-Araujo H, Jacobs S, Franco G, Venancio T . Phylogenetic analysis and population structure of Pseudomonas alloputida. Genomics. 2021; 113(6):3762-3773. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.09.008. View

18.

Cohan F . Systematics: The Cohesive Nature of Bacterial Species Taxa. Curr Biol. 2019; 29(5):R169-R172. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.033. View

19.

Dewar A, Hao C, Belcher L, Ghoul M, West S . Bacterial lifestyle shapes pangenomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(21):e2320170121. PMC: 11126918. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2320170121. View

20.

Hugenholtz P, Chuvochina M, Oren A, Parks D, Soo R . Prokaryotic taxonomy and nomenclature in the age of big sequence data. ISME J. 2021; 15(7):1879-1892. PMC: 8245423. DOI: 10.1038/s41396-021-00941-x. View