» Articles » PMID: 24691843

Slab Profile Encoding (PEN) for Minimizing Slab Boundary Artifact in Three-dimensional Diffusion-weighted Multislab Acquisition

Overview
Journal Magn Reson Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Radiology
Date 2014 Apr 3
PMID 24691843
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To propose a method for mitigating slab boundary artifacts in three-dimensional (3D) multislab diffusion imaging with no or minimal increases in scan time.

Methods: The multislab acquisition was treated as parallel imaging acquisition where the slab profiles acted as the traditional receiver sensitivity profiles. All the slabs were then reconstructed simultaneously along the slab direction using Cartesian-based sensitivity encoding (SENSE) reconstruction. The slab profile estimation was performed using either a Bloch simulation or a calibration scan.

Results: Both phantom and in vivo results showed negligible slab boundary artifacts after reconstruction using the proposed method. The performance of the proposed method is comparable to the state-of-the-art slab combination method without the scan time penalty that depends on the number of acquired volumes. The obtained g-factor map of the SENSE reconstruction problem showed a maximum g-factor of 1.7 in the region of interest.

Conclusion: We proposed a novel method for mitigating slab boundary artifacts in 3D diffusion imaging by treating the multislab acquisition as a parallel imaging acquisition and reconstructing all slabs simultaneously using Cartesian SENSE. Unlike existing methods, the scan time increase, if any, does not scale with the number of image volumes acquired.

Citing Articles

Romer-EPTI: Rotating-view motion-robust super-resolution EPTI for SNR-efficient distortion-free in-vivo mesoscale diffusion MRI and microstructure imaging.

Dong Z, Reese T, Lee H, Huang S, Polimeni J, Wald L Magn Reson Med. 2024; 93(4):1535-1555.

PMID: 39552568 PMC: 11782731. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30365.


2D CAIPI accelerated 3D multi-slab diffusion weighted EPI combined with qModeL reconstruction for fast high resolution microstructure imaging.

Lee C, Mani M Magn Reson Imaging. 2024; 111:57-66.

PMID: 38599504 PMC: 11179987. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.04.003.


Romer-EPTI: rotating-view motion-robust super-resolution EPTI for SNR-efficient distortion-free in-vivo mesoscale dMRI and microstructure imaging.

Dong Z, Reese T, Lee H, Huang S, Polimeni J, Wald L bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38352481 PMC: 10862730. DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.26.577343.


High-fidelity mesoscale in-vivo diffusion MRI through gSlider-BUDA and circular EPI with S-LORAKS reconstruction.

Liao C, Yarach U, Cao X, Iyer S, Wang N, Kim T Neuroimage. 2023; 275:120168.

PMID: 37187364 PMC: 10451786. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120168.


Multi-band multi-shot diffusion MRI reconstruction with joint usage of structured low-rank constraints and explicit phase mapping.

Dai E, Mani M, McNab J Magn Reson Med. 2022; 89(1):95-111.

PMID: 36063492 PMC: 9887994. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29422.


References
1.
Liu K, Lee D, Rutt B . Systematic assessment and evaluation of sliding interleaved kY (SLINKY) acquisition for 3D MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998; 8(4):912-23. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880080422. View

2.
Murakami J, Weinberger E, Tsuruda J, Mitchell J, Yuan C . Multislab three-dimensional T2-weighted fast spin-echo imaging of the hippocampus: sequence optimization. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1995; 5(3):309-15. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880050315. View

3.
Oshio K, Jolesz F, Melki P, Mulkern R . T2-weighted thin-section imaging with the multislab three-dimensional RARE technique. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1991; 1(6):695-700. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880010614. View

4.
Jones D, Horsfield M, Simmons A . Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1999; 42(3):515-25. View

5.
Schmiedeskamp H, Straka M, Bammer R . Compensation of slice profile mismatch in combined spin- and gradient-echo echo-planar imaging pulse sequences. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 67(2):378-88. PMC: 3245351. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23012. View