» Articles » PMID: 24601891

Understanding, Teaching and Assessing the Elements of the CanMEDS Professional Role: Canadian Program Directors' Views

Overview
Journal Med Teach
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2014 Mar 8
PMID 24601891
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Physicians are required to maintain and sustain professional roles during their careers, making the Professional Role an important component of postgraduate education. Despite this, this role remains difficult to define, teach and assess.

Objective: To (a) understand what program directors felt were key elements of the CanMEDS Professional Role and (b) identify the teaching and assessment methods they used.

Methods: A two-step sequential mixed method design using a survey and semi-structured interviews with Canadian program directors.

Results: Forty-six program directors (48% response rate) completed the questionnaire and 10 participated in interviews. Participants rated integrity and honesty as the most important elements of the Role (96%) but most difficult to teach. There was a lack of congruence between elements perceived to be most important and most frequently taught. Role modeling was the most common way of informally teaching professionalism (98%). Assessments were most often through direct feedback from faculty (98%) and feedback from other health professionals and residents (61%). Portfolios (24%) were the least used form of assessment, but they allowed residents to reflect and stimulated self-assessment.

Conclusion: Program directors believe elements of the Role are difficult to teach and assess. Providing faculty with skills for teaching/assessing the Role and evaluating effectiveness in changing attitudes/behaviors should be a priority in postgraduate programs.

Citing Articles

Ethical issues in unprofessional behavior of residents who dispute dismissal: ten year analysis of case law in hospital-based specialties.

Godschalx-Dekker J, Pronk S, Olthuis G, Hoopen R, van Mook W BMC Med Ethics. 2025; 26(1):25.

PMID: 39948536 PMC: 11823240. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-025-01180-x.


Automating the Identification of Feedback Quality Criteria and the CanMEDS Roles in Written Feedback Comments Using Natural Language Processing.

Van Ostaeyen S, De Langhe L, De Clercq O, Embo M, Schellens T, Valcke M Perspect Med Educ. 2023; 12(1):540-549.

PMID: 38144670 PMC: 10742245. DOI: 10.5334/pme.1056.


Dismissed Psychiatry Residents Who Appeal: Exploring Unprofessional Behavior.

Godschalx J, van Mook W Acad Psychiatry. 2023; 47(4):344-351.

PMID: 36853268 PMC: 10447273. DOI: 10.1007/s40596-023-01746-0.


A modified Delphi approach to nurturing professionalism in postgraduate medical education in Singapore.

Teo Y, Peh T, Abdurrahman A, Lee A, Chiam M, Fong W Singapore Med J. 2021; 65(6):313-325.

PMID: 34823327 PMC: 11232710. DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2021224.


Not wanted on the voyage: highlighting intrinsic CanMEDS gaps in curricula.

Binnendyk J, Pack R, Field E, Watling C Can Med Educ J. 2021; 12(4):39-47.

PMID: 34567304 PMC: 8463229. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.70950.