» Articles » PMID: 36853268

Dismissed Psychiatry Residents Who Appeal: Exploring Unprofessional Behavior

Overview
Journal Acad Psychiatry
Publisher Springer
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2023 Feb 28
PMID 36853268
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Dutch psychiatry residents who are dismissed from their training program have the opportunity to appeal the decision. Those appeals are publicly available. This report explores the appeals of residents dismissed for unprofessional behavior.

Methods: The authors analyzed caselaw of dismissed psychiatry residents brought before the conciliation board of The Royal Dutch Medical Association and compared them to a control group of caselaw of dismissed family medicine residents.

Results: From 2011 to 2020, 19 psychiatry residents were dismissed for failing to meet the competencies of the CanMEDS professional domain and matched with 19 family medicine residents. Most psychiatry residents deficient in professionalism were considered deficient in their attitude, in reliability of keeping agreements, or in their ability to profit from supervisors' feedback. Insufficient professional behavior overlapped with insufficient communication, collaboration, and management. Half of the psychiatry residents with deficits in professionalism went on sick leave at some time. Between residents in psychiatry and family medicine, or between psychiatry residents with and without a favorable conciliation board decision, no statistical differences were found regarding gender, year of residency, and number of insufficient competencies.

Conclusions: The deficiencies in the professionalism of residents who challenged their program director's decision to be dismissed mostly consisted of inadequate attitude or the inability to profit from feedback, suggesting that these residents lack empathy, introspection, or both.

Citing Articles

Ethical issues in unprofessional behavior of residents who dispute dismissal: ten year analysis of case law in hospital-based specialties.

Godschalx-Dekker J, Pronk S, Olthuis G, Hoopen R, van Mook W BMC Med Ethics. 2025; 26(1):25.

PMID: 39948536 PMC: 11823240. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-025-01180-x.


Unprofessional behaviour of GP residents leading to a dismissal dispute: characteristics and outcomes of those who appeal.

Godschalx-Dekker J, Sijbom C, Barnhoorn P, van Mook W BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):61.

PMID: 38378463 PMC: 10877848. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02294-8.

References
1.
Papadakis M, Teherani A, Banach M, Knettler T, Rattner S, Stern D . Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behavior in medical school. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353(25):2673-82. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa052596. View

2.
Bhatti N, Ahmed A, Stewart M, Miller R, Choi S . Remediation of problematic residents--A national survey. Laryngoscope. 2015; 126(4):834-8. DOI: 10.1002/lary.25599. View

3.
Guerrasio J, Garrity M, Aagaard E . Learner deficits and academic outcomes of medical students, residents, fellows, and attending physicians referred to a remediation program, 2006-2012. Acad Med. 2013; 89(2):352-8. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000122. View

4.
Barnhoorn P, Nierkens V, Mak-van der Vossen M, Numans M, van Mook W, Kramer A . Unprofessional behaviour of GP residents and its remediation: a qualitative study among supervisors and faculty. BMC Fam Pract. 2021; 22(1):249. PMC: 8686537. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01609-3. View

5.
Vermeulen M, Kuyvenhoven M, de Groot E, Zuithoff N, Pieters H, van der Graaf Y . Poor Performance Among Trainees in a Dutch Postgraduate GP Training Program. Fam Med. 2016; 48(6):430-8. View