» Articles » PMID: 24500542

RSVP Keyboard: An EEG Based Typing Interface

Overview
Date 2014 Feb 7
PMID 24500542
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Humans need communication. The desire to communicate remains one of the primary issues for people with locked-in syndrome (LIS). While many assistive and augmentative communication systems that use various physiological signals are available commercially, the need is not satisfactorily met. Brain interfaces, in particular, those that utilize event related potentials (ERP) in electroencephalography (EEG) to detect the intent of a person noninvasively, are emerging as a promising communication interface to meet this need where existing options are insufficient. Existing brain interfaces for typing use many repetitions of the visual stimuli in order to increase accuracy at the cost of speed. However, speed is also crucial and is an integral portion of peer-to-peer communication; a message that is not delivered timely often looses its importance. Consequently, we utilize rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) in conjunction with language models in order to assist letter selection during the brain-typing process with the final goal of developing a system that achieves high accuracy and speed simultaneously. This paper presents initial results from the RSVP Keyboard system that is under development. These initial results on healthy and locked-in subjects show that single-trial or few-trial accurate letter selection may be possible with the RSVP Keyboard paradigm.

Citing Articles

The Effect of Jittered Stimulus Onset Interval on Electrophysiological Markers of Attention in a Brain-Computer Interface Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Paradigm.

Klee D, Memmott T, Oken B Signals (Basel). 2024; 5(1):18-39.

PMID: 39421856 PMC: 11486514. DOI: 10.3390/signals5010002.


A review on the performance of brain-computer interface systems used for patients with locked-in and completely locked-in syndrome.

Rezvani S, Hosseini-Zahraei S, Tootchi A, Guger C, Chaibakhsh Y, Saberi A Cogn Neurodyn. 2024; 18(4):1419-1443.

PMID: 39104673 PMC: 11297882. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-023-09995-3.


A spatial-temporal linear feature learning algorithm for P300-based brain-computer interfaces.

Aghili S, Kilani S, Khushaba R, Rouhani E Heliyon. 2023; 9(4):e15380.

PMID: 37113774 PMC: 10126938. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15380.


Target-Related Alpha Attenuation in a Brain-Computer Interface Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Calibration.

Klee D, Memmott T, Smedemark-Margulies N, Celik B, Erdogmus D, Oken B Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:882557.

PMID: 35529775 PMC: 9070017. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.882557.


Feedback Related Potentials for EEG-Based Typing Systems.

Gonzalez-Navarro P, Celik B, Moghadamfalahi M, Akcakaya M, Fried-Oken M, Erdogmus D Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 15:788258.

PMID: 35145386 PMC: 8821166. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.788258.


References
1.
Pfurtscheller G, Neuper C, Guger C, Harkam W, Ramoser H, Schlogl A . Current trends in Graz Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000; 8(2):216-9. DOI: 10.1109/86.847821. View

2.
Treder M, Blankertz B . (C)overt attention and visual speller design in an ERP-based brain-computer interface. Behav Brain Funct. 2010; 6:28. PMC: 2904265. DOI: 10.1186/1744-9081-6-28. View

3.
Brunner P, Joshi S, Briskin S, Wolpaw J, Bischof H, Schalk G . Does the 'P300' speller depend on eye gaze?. J Neural Eng. 2010; 7(5):056013. PMC: 2992970. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/7/5/056013. View

4.
Serby H, Yom-Tov E, Inbar G . An improved P300-based brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005; 13(1):89-98. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.841878. View

5.
Krusienski D, Sellers E, McFarland D, Vaughan T, Wolpaw J . Toward enhanced P300 speller performance. J Neurosci Methods. 2007; 167(1):15-21. PMC: 2349091. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.07.017. View