» Articles » PMID: 24459327

Validating the Unequal-variance Assumption in Recognition Memory Using Response Time Distributions Instead of ROC Functions: A Diffusion Model Analysis

Overview
Journal J Mem Lang
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2014 Jan 25
PMID 24459327
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recognition memory z-transformed Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) functions have a slope less than 1. One way to accommodate this finding is to assume that memory evidence is more variable for studied (old) items than non-studied (new) items. This assumption has been implemented in signal detection models, but this approach cannot accommodate the time course of decision making. We tested the unequal-variance assumption by fitting the diffusion model to accuracy and response time (RT) distributions from nine old/new recognition data sets comprising previously-published data from 376 participants. The η parameter in the diffusion model measures between-trial variability in evidence based on accuracy and the RT distributions for correct and error responses. In fits to nine data sets, η estimates were higher for targets than lures in all cases, and fitting results rejected an equal-variance version of the model in favor of an unequal-variance version. Parameter recovery simulations showed that the variability differences were not produced by biased estimation of the η parameter. Estimates of the other model parameters were largely consistent between the equal- and unequal-variance versions of the model. Our results provide independent support for the unequal-variance assumption without using ROC data.

Citing Articles

EGEFACE: A new face memory test with static and dynamic images.

Amado S, Karatas M, Yuvruk E, Kapucu A Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(2):64.

PMID: 39838135 PMC: 11750894. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02592-0.


Dissociable Contributions of Goal-Relevant Evidence and Goal-Irrelevant Familiarity to Individual and Developmental Differences in Conflict Recognition.

Weigard A, Suzuki T, Skalaban L, Conley M, Cohen A, Garavan H Cogn Sci. 2024; 48(11):e70019.

PMID: 39587984 PMC: 11589665. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.70019.


A hierarchical signal detection model with unequal variance for binary responses.

Lages M Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 31(6):2534-2557.

PMID: 38806791 PMC: 11680650. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02504-5.


The gated cascade diffusion model: An integrated theory of decision making, motor preparation, and motor execution.

Dendauw E, Evans N, Logan G, Haffen E, Bennabi D, Gajdos T Psychol Rev. 2024; 131(4):825-857.

PMID: 38386394 PMC: 7616365. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000464.


Integrating word-form representations with global similarity computation in recognition memory.

Osth A, Zhang L Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 31(3):1000-1031.

PMID: 37973762 PMC: 11192833. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02402-2.


References
1.
Jang Y, Mickes L, Wixted J . Three tests and three corrections: comment on Koen and Yonelinas (2010). J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012; 38(2):513-23. PMC: 3345267. DOI: 10.1037/a0025880. View

2.
Starns J, White C, Ratcliff R . The strength-based mirror effect in subjective strength ratings: the evidence for differentiation can be produced without differentiation. Mem Cognit. 2012; 40(8):1189-99. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0225-1. View

3.
Ratcliff R, Starns J . Modeling confidence judgments, response times, and multiple choices in decision making: recognition memory and motion discrimination. Psychol Rev. 2013; 120(3):697-719. PMC: 4106127. DOI: 10.1037/a0033152. View

4.
Ratcliff R, Sheu C, Gronlund S . Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychol Rev. 1992; 99(3):518-35. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.3.518. View

5.
Ratcliff R, Starns J . Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory. Psychol Rev. 2009; 116(1):59-83. PMC: 2693899. DOI: 10.1037/a0014086. View