Dissociable Contributions of Goal-Relevant Evidence and Goal-Irrelevant Familiarity to Individual and Developmental Differences in Conflict Recognition

Overview

Journal Cogn Sci

Specialty Psychology

Date 2024 Nov 26

PMID 39587984

Authors

Alexander Weigard

Takakuni Suzuki

Lena J Skalaban

May Conley

Alexandra O Cohen

Hugh Garavan

Mary M Heitzeg

B J Casey

Chandra Sripada

Andrew Heathcote

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Recent studies using the diffusion decision model find that performance across many cognitive control tasks can be largely attributed to a task-general efficiency of evidence accumulation (EEA) factor that reflects individuals' ability to selectively gather evidence relevant to task goals. However, estimates of EEA from an n-back "conflict recognition" paradigm in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, a large, diverse sample of youth, appear to contradict these findings. EEA estimates from "lure" trials-which present stimuli that are familiar (i.e., presented previously) but do not meet formal criteria for being a target-show inconsistent relations with EEA estimates from other trials and display atypical v-shaped bivariate distributions, suggesting many individuals are responding based largely on stimulus familiarity rather than goal-relevant stimulus features. We present a new formal model of evidence integration in conflict recognition tasks that distinguishes individuals' EEA for goal-relevant evidence from their use of goal-irrelevant familiarity. We then investigate developmental, cognitive, and clinical correlates of these novel parameters. Parameters for EEA and goal-irrelevant familiarity-based processing showed strong correlations across levels of n-back load, suggesting they are task-general dimensions that influence individuals' performance regardless of working memory demands. Only EEA showed large, robust developmental differences in the ABCD sample and an independent age-diverse sample. EEA also exhibited higher test-retest reliability and uniquely meaningful associations with clinically relevant dimensions. These findings establish a principled modeling framework for characterizing conflict recognition mechanisms and have several broader implications for research on individual and developmental differences in cognitive control.

References

Chen W, Faraone S, Biederman J, Tsuang M . Diagnostic accuracy of the Child Behavior Checklist scales for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a receiver-operating characteristic analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994; 62(5):1017-1025. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.62.5.1017. View

Szmalec A, Verbruggen F, Vandierendonck A, Kemps E . Control of interference during working memory updating. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010; 37(1):137-51. DOI: 10.1037/a0020365. View

Lin Y, Weibel J, Landolt H, Santini F, Slawik H, Borgwardt S . Brain activity during a working memory task after daily caffeine intake and caffeine withdrawal: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):1002. PMC: 9849460. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26808-5. View

Dick A, Lopez D, Watts A, Heeringa S, Reuter C, Bartsch H . Meaningful associations in the adolescent brain cognitive development study. Neuroimage. 2021; 239:118262. PMC: 8803401. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118262. View

Schmiedek F, Hildebrandt A, Lovden M, Wilhelm O, Lindenberger U . Complex span versus updating tasks of working memory: the gap is not that deep. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009; 35(4):1089-1096. DOI: 10.1037/a0015730. View

Ziegler S, Pedersen M, Mowinckel A, Biele G . Modelling ADHD: A review of ADHD theories through their predictions for computational models of decision-making and reinforcement learning. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016; 71:633-656. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.002. View

Weigard A, Matzke D, Tanis C, Heathcote A . A cognitive process modeling framework for the ABCD study stop-signal task. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2023; 59:101191. PMC: 9826813. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101191. View

Akshoomoff N, Beaumont J, Bauer P, Dikmen S, Gershon R, Mungas D . VIII. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): composite scores of crystallized, fluid, and overall cognition. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2013; 78(4):119-32. PMC: 4103789. DOI: 10.1111/mono.12038. View

Cordova M, Antovich D, Ryabinin P, Neighbor C, Mooney M, Dieckmann N . Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Restricted Phenotypes Prevalence, Comorbidity, and Polygenic Risk Sensitivity in the ABCD Baseline Cohort. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022; 61(10):1273-1284. PMC: 9677584. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.03.030. View

10.

Lerche V, von Krause M, Voss A, Frischkorn G, Schubert A, Hagemann D . Diffusion modeling and intelligence: Drift rates show both domain-general and domain-specific relations with intelligence. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020; 149(12):2207-2249. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000774. View

11.

Kane M, Conway A, Miura T, Colflesh G . Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007; 33(3):615-622. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.615. View

12.

Townsend J . Mathematical Psychology: Prospects For The 21 Century: A Guest Editorial. J Math Psychol. 2009; 52(5):269-280. PMC: 2651093. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2008.05.001. View

13.

Fosco W, White C, Hawk Jr L . Acute Stimulant Treatment and Reinforcement Increase the Speed of Information Accumulation in Children with ADHD. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016; 45(5):911-920. PMC: 10037188. DOI: 10.1007/s10802-016-0222-0. View

14.

Turner B, Forstmann B, Love B, Palmeri T, Van Maanen L . Approaches to Analysis in Model-based Cognitive Neuroscience. J Math Psychol. 2019; 76(B):65-79. PMC: 6863443. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.01.001. View

15.

Parks C, Yonelinas A . Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: comment on Wixted (2007). Psychol Rev. 2007; 114(1):188-202. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.188. View

16.

Weigard A, Brislin S, Cope L, Hardee J, Martz M, Ly A . Evidence accumulation and associated error-related brain activity as computationally-informed prospective predictors of substance use in emerging adulthood. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021; 238(9):2629-2644. PMC: 8452274. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-021-05885-w. View

17.

Epstein J, Karalunas S, Tamm L, Dudley J, Lynch J, Altaye M . Examining reaction time variability on the stop-signal task in the ABCD study. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2022; 29(5):492-502. PMC: 9971352. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617722000431. View

18.

Verbruggen F, McLaren I, Chambers C . Banishing the Control Homunculi in Studies of Action Control and Behavior Change. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014; 9(5):497-524. PMC: 4232338. DOI: 10.1177/1745691614526414. View

19.

Evans N, Steyvers M, Brown S . Modeling the Covariance Structure of Complex Datasets Using Cognitive Models: An Application to Individual Differences and the Heritability of Cognitive Ability. Cogn Sci. 2018; . DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12627. View

20.

Davidson M, Amso D, Anderson L, Diamond A . Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia. 2006; 44(11):2037-78. PMC: 1513793. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.006. View