Modeling Confidence and Response Time in Recognition Memory

Overview

Journal Psychol Rev

Publisher American Psychological Association

Specialty Psychology

Date 2009 Jan 23

PMID 19159148

Citations 89

Authors

Roger Ratcliff

Jeffrey J Starns

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

A new model for confidence judgments in recognition memory is presented. In the model, the match between a single test item and memory produces a distribution of evidence, with better matches corresponding to distributions with higher means. On this match dimension, confidence criteria are placed, and the areas between the criteria under the distribution are used as drift rates to drive racing Ornstein-Uhlenbeck diffusion processes. The model is fit to confidence judgments and quantile response times from two recognition memory experiments that manipulated word frequency and speed versus accuracy emphasis. The model and data show that the standard signal detection interpretation of z-transformed receiver operating characteristic (z-ROC) functions is wrong. The model also explains sequential effects in which the slope of the z-ROC function changes by about 10% as a function of the prior response in the test list.

Citing Articles

Context familiarity is a third kind of episodic memory distinct from item familiarity and recollection.

Addante R, Clise E, Waechter R, Bengson J, Drane D, Perez-Caban J iScience. 2025; 27(12):111439.

PMID: 39758982 PMC: 11699256. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111439.

A novel behavioral paradigm reveals the nature of confidence computation in multi-alternative perceptual decision making.

Xue K, Shekhar M, Rahnev D Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39711537 PMC: 11661388. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5510856/v1.

Probing the origins of subjective confidence in source memory decisions in young and older adults: A sequential sampling account.

Darby K, Gettleman J, Dodson C, Sederberg P J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024; 154(3):799-828.

PMID: 39666519 PMC: 11802305. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001680.

Challenging the Bayesian confidence hypothesis in perceptual decision-making.

Xue K, Shekhar M, Rahnev D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(48):e2410487121.

PMID: 39576348 PMC: 11621837. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2410487121.

Bayesian confidence in optimal decisions.

Calder-Travis J, Charles L, Bogacz R, Yeung N Psychol Rev. 2024; 131(5):1114-1160.

PMID: 39023934 PMC: 7617410. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000472.

References

Slotnick S, Klein S, Dodson C, Shimamura A . An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001; 26(6):1499-517. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1499. View

Ratcliff R . Modeling response signal and response time data. Cogn Psychol. 2006; 53(3):195-237. PMC: 2397556. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.002. View

McElree B, Dolan P, Jacoby L . Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: a time course analysis. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999; 25(3):563-82. PMC: 3313826. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.25.3.563. View

Ratcliff R, Sheu C, Gronlund S . Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychol Rev. 1992; 99(3):518-35. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.3.518. View

Gronlund S, Ratcliff R . Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989; 15(5):846-58. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.5.846. View

Pike A . Stochastic models of choice behaviour: response probabilities and latencies of finite Markov chain systems. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1966; 19(1):15-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1966.tb00351.x. View

Glanzer M, Adams J . The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990; 16(1):5-16. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.16.1.5. View

Brown S, Marley A, Donkin C, Heathcote A . An integrated model of choices and response times in absolute identification. Psychol Rev. 2008; 115(2):396-425. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.396. View

Ratcliff R, Gomez P, McKoon G . A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychol Rev. 2004; 111(1):159-82. PMC: 1403837. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.159. View

10.

Audley R . A stochastic model for individual choice behavior. Psychol Rev. 1960; 67:1-15. DOI: 10.1037/h0046438. View

11.

Merkle E, Van Zandt T . An application of the poisson race model to confidence calibration. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006; 135(3):391-408. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.391. View

12.

Yonelinas A . Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity. Mem Cognit. 1998; 25(6):747-63. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211318. View

13.

Kelley R, Wixted J . On the nature of associative information in recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001; 27(3):701-22. View

14.

Ratcliff R, McKoon G, Tindall M . Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994; 20(4):763-85. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.4.763. View

15.

Juslin P, Olsson H . Thurstonian and Brunswikian origins of uncertainty in judgment: a sampling model of confidence in sensory discrimination. Psychol Rev. 1997; 104(2):344-66. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.344. View

16.

Heathcote A . Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003; 29(6):1210-30. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1210. View

17.

Wagenmakers E, Ratcliff R, Gomez P, McKoon G . A Diffusion Model Account of Criterion Shifts in the Lexical Decision Task. J Mem Lang. 2009; 58(1):140-159. PMC: 2330283. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.006. View

18.

Malmberg K, Xu J . The influence of averaging and noisy decision strategies on the recognition memory ROC. Psychon Bull Rev. 2006; 13(1):99-105. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193819. View

19.

Hirshman E, Hostetter M . Using ROC curves to test models of recognition memory: the relationship between presentation duration and slope. Mem Cognit. 2000; 28(2):161-6. DOI: 10.3758/bf03213795. View

20.

Ratcliff R . Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses. Psychol Rev. 1985; 92(2):212-25. View