» Articles » PMID: 24442681

Remodeling Characteristics and Collagen Distribution in Synthetic Mesh Materials Explanted from Human Subjects After Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: an Analysis of Remodeling Characteristics by Patient Risk Factors and Surgical Site Classifications

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2014 Jan 21
PMID 24442681
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the associations between patient characteristics or surgical site classifications and the histologic remodeling scores of synthetic meshes biopsied from their abdominal wall repair sites in the first attempt to generate a multivariable risk prediction model of non-constructive remodeling.

Methods: Biopsies of the synthetic meshes were obtained from the abdominal wall repair sites of 51 patients during a subsequent abdominal re-exploration. Biopsies were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and evaluated according to a semi-quantitative scoring system for remodeling characteristics (cell infiltration, cell types, extracellular matrix deposition, inflammation, fibrous encapsulation, and neovascularization) and a mean composite score (CR). Biopsies were also stained with Sirius Red and Fast Green, and analyzed to determine the collagen I:III ratio. Based on univariate analyses between subject clinical characteristics or surgical site classification and the histologic remodeling scores, cohort variables were selected for multivariable regression models using a threshold p value of ≤0.200.

Results: The model selection process for the extracellular matrix score yielded two variables: subject age at time of mesh implantation, and mesh classification (c-statistic = 0.842). For CR score, the model selection process yielded two variables: subject age at time of mesh implantation and mesh classification (r (2) = 0.464). The model selection process for the collagen III area yielded a model with two variables: subject body mass index at time of mesh explantation and pack-year history (r (2) = 0.244).

Conclusion: Host characteristics and surgical site assessments may predict degree of remodeling for synthetic meshes used to reinforce abdominal wall repair sites. These preliminary results constitute the first steps in generating a risk prediction model that predicts the patients and clinical circumstances for which non-constructive remodeling of an abdominal wall repair site with synthetic mesh reinforcement is most likely to occur.

Citing Articles

Braxon-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction: A decade later.

Bassetto F, Pandis L, Facchin F, Azzena G, Vindigni V Front Surg. 2022; 9:1009356.

PMID: 36420412 PMC: 9677958. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1009356.


Analyzing material changes consistent with degradation of explanted polymeric hernia mesh related to clinical characteristics.

Lu X, Harman M, Heniford B, Augenstein V, McIver B, Bridges W Surg Endosc. 2022; 36(7):5121-5135.

PMID: 35257210 PMC: 10851311. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08882-4.


Morphological evaluation of polysaccharide content and collagen composition during cutaneous wound healing in the Sunda porcupine (Hystrix javanica).

Prawira A, Hosaka Y, Novelina S, Farida W, Darusman H, Agungpriyono S J Vet Med Sci. 2020; 82(5):506-515.

PMID: 32213731 PMC: 7273595. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.19-0603.


Silver nanoparticles alter epithelial basement membrane integrity, cell adhesion molecule expression, and TGF-β1 secretion.

Martin M, Reaves D, Jeffcoat B, Enders J, Costantini L, Yeyeodu S Nanomedicine. 2019; 21:102070.

PMID: 31351238 PMC: 6814557. DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2019.102070.


Abdominal Wall Reconstruction after Flap Surgery and the Effect on the Immune System.

Popa F, Georgescu A Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:2421585.

PMID: 29201900 PMC: 5671673. DOI: 10.1155/2017/2421585.


References
1.
Orenstein S, Saberski E, Kreutzer D, Novitsky Y . Comparative analysis of histopathologic effects of synthetic meshes based on material, weight, and pore size in mice. J Surg Res. 2011; 176(2):423-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.031. View

2.
El-Gazzaz G, Farag S, El-Sayd M, Mohamed H . The use of synthetic mesh in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair during colorectal resection: risk of infection and recurrence. Asian J Surg. 2012; 35(4):149-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2012.06.003. View

3.
Heinze G, Schemper M . A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat Med. 2002; 21(16):2409-19. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1047. View

4.
Valentin J, Badylak J, McCabe G, Badylak S . Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds for orthopaedic applications. A comparative histologic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(12):2673-86. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01008. View

5.
Bellows C, Alder A, Helton W . Abdominal wall reconstruction using biological tissue grafts: present status and future opportunities. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2006; 3(5):657-75. DOI: 10.1586/17434440.3.5.657. View