» Articles » PMID: 24436246

Volumetric Arterial Wall Shear Stress Calculation Based on Cine Phase Contrast MRI

Overview
Date 2014 Jan 18
PMID 24436246
Citations 79
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess the accuracy and precision of a volumetric wall shear stress (WSS) calculation method applied to cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) data.

Materials And Methods: Volumetric WSS vectors were calculated in software phantoms. WSS algorithm parameters were optimized and the influence of spatial resolution and segmentation was evaluated. Subsequently, 2D cine PC-MRI data in the carotid and the aorta at varying spatial resolutions were obtained (n = 2) and compared with the simulations. Finally, volumetric WSS was calculated in 3D cine PC-MRI data of the carotid bifurcation and the aorta (n = 6).

Results: We found that at least 8 voxels across the diameter are required to obtain a WSS accuracy of 5% and a precision of 20% in software phantoms. Systematic WSS quantification errors up to 40% were found in the case of segmentation errors. The in vivo measurements using 2D cine PC-MRI exhibited WSS increase at increasing spatial resolutions, similar to the results in software phantoms. Volumetric WSS vectors were successfully calculated in three healthy carotid bifurcations and aortas.

Conclusion: The effects of resolution and segmentation on the accuracy and precision of the WSS algorithm were quantified. We were able to calculate volumetric WSS in the carotid bifurcation and the aorta.

Citing Articles

Hemodynamic evaluation of the pulmonary arteries and aorta using 4D flow cardiac MRI in children and young adults with dextro-transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation.

Calderon K, Sodhi A, Johnson E, Markl M, Robinson J, Rigsby C Pediatr Radiol. 2024; 55(2):280-296.

PMID: 39704828 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-024-06110-4.


Feasibility of 4D-flow CMR for haemodynamic characterization in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy after septal myectomy with and without anterior mitral valve leaflet extension.

El Mathari S, van Ooij P, Merton R, Schrauben E, Hopman L, Nederveen A Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024; 40(1).

PMID: 39680912 PMC: 11852344. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivae210.


Robustness of 4D flow MRI derived aortic wall shear stress and pulse wave velocity across different protocols in healthy controls and in patients with bicuspid aortic valve.

Dushfunian D, Maroun A, Berhan H, Baraboo J, Johnson E, Jarvis K Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024; 41(1):137-149.

PMID: 39652207 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-024-03299-1.


The influence of post-processing software on quantitative results in 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations.

Trauzeddel R, Muller M, Demir A, Wiesemann S, Daud E, Schmitter S Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1465554.

PMID: 39399512 PMC: 11467864. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1465554.


Imaging of Carotid Stenosis: Where Are We Standing? Comparison of Multiparametric Ultrasound, CT Angiography, and MRI Angiography, with Recent Developments.

David E, Grazhdani H, Aliotta L, Gavazzi L, Foti P, Palmucci S Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(16).

PMID: 39202195 PMC: 11352936. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14161708.