» Articles » PMID: 36568555

Advances in Machine Learning Applications for Cardiovascular 4D Flow MRI

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has evolved as a non-invasive imaging technique to visualize and quantify blood flow in the heart and vessels. Hemodynamic parameters derived from 4D flow MRI, such as net flow and peak velocities, but also kinetic energy, turbulent kinetic energy, viscous energy loss, and wall shear stress have shown to be of diagnostic relevance for cardiovascular diseases. 4D flow MRI, however, has several limitations. Its long acquisition times and its limited spatio-temporal resolutions lead to inaccuracies in velocity measurements in small and low-flow vessels and near the vessel wall. Additionally, 4D flow MRI requires long post-processing times, since inaccuracies due to the measurement process need to be corrected for and parameter quantification requires 2D and 3D contour drawing. Several machine learning (ML) techniques have been proposed to overcome these limitations. Existing scan acceleration methods have been extended using ML for image reconstruction and ML based super-resolution methods have been used to assimilate high-resolution computational fluid dynamic simulations and 4D flow MRI, which leads to more realistic velocity results. ML efforts have also focused on the automation of other post-processing steps, by learning phase corrections and anti-aliasing. To automate contour drawing and 3D segmentation, networks such as the U-Net have been widely applied. This review summarizes the latest ML advances in 4D flow MRI with a focus on technical aspects and applications. It is divided into the current status of fast and accurate 4D flow MRI data generation, ML based post-processing tools for phase correction and vessel delineation and the statistical evaluation of blood flow.

Citing Articles

Expanding the volume on 4D flow CMR : Editorial for "Robustness of 4D flow MRI derived aortic wall shear stress and pulse wave velocity across different protocols in healthy controls and in patients with bicuspid aortic valve".

Fischer K, Bastiaansen J Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025; 41(2):181-183.

PMID: 39870958 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-025-03335-8.


Going with the flow: Implementing a 4D flow MRI program at a children's hospital.

Sodhi A, Brown N, Robinson J, Popescu A, Markl M, Rigsby C Pediatr Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39540925 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-024-06093-2.


Unraveling diurnal and technical variability in cerebral hemodynamics from neurovascular 4D-Flow MRI.

Rivera-Rivera L, Roberts G, Peret A, Langhough R, Jonaitis E, Du L J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2024; 44(8):1362-1375.

PMID: 38340787 PMC: 11342721. DOI: 10.1177/0271678X241232190.


Exploring the Intersection of Geophysics and Diagnostic Imaging in the Health Sciences.

Singh R, Nayak N, Behl T, Arora R, Anwer M, Gulati M Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38248016 PMC: 11154438. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14020139.


Four-dimensional flow MRI for quantitative assessment of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics: Status and opportunities.

Rivera-Rivera L, Vikner T, Eisenmenger L, Johnson S, Johnson K NMR Biomed. 2023; 37(7):e5082.

PMID: 38124351 PMC: 11162953. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.5082.


References
1.
Dirix P, Buoso S, Peper E, Kozerke S . Synthesis of patient-specific multipoint 4D flow MRI data of turbulent aortic flow downstream of stenotic valves. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):16004. PMC: 9513106. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20121-x. View

2.
Adriaans B, Westenberg J, van Cauteren Y, Gerretsen S, Elbaz M, Bekkers S . Clinical assessment of aortic valve stenosis: Comparison between 4D flow MRI and transthoracic echocardiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019; 51(2):472-480. PMC: 7004028. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26847. View

3.
Wigstrom L, Ebbers T, Fyrenius A, Karlsson M, Engvall J, Wranne B . Particle trace visualization of intracardiac flow using time-resolved 3D phase contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1999; 41(4):793-9. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199904)41:4<793::aid-mrm19>3.0.co;2-2. View

4.
Haji-Valizadeh H, Guo R, Kucukseymen S, Paskavitz A, Cai X, Rodriguez J . Highly accelerated free-breathing real-time phase contrast cardiovascular MRI via complex-difference deep learning. Magn Reson Med. 2021; 86(2):804-819. PMC: 8145775. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28750. View

5.
Corrado P, Seiter D, Wieben O . Automatic measurement plane placement for 4D Flow MRI of the great vessels using deep learning. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021; 17(1):199-210. PMC: 8851604. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-021-02475-1. View