» Articles » PMID: 24434808

Potential of Compressed Sensing in Quantitative MR Imaging of Cancer

Overview
Journal Cancer Imaging
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2014 Jan 18
PMID 24434808
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Classic signal processing theory dictates that, in order to faithfully reconstruct a band-limited signal (e.g., an image), the sampling rate must be at least twice the maximum frequency contained within the signal, i.e., the Nyquist frequency. Recent developments in applied mathematics, however, have shown that it is often possible to reconstruct signals sampled below the Nyquist rate. This new method of compressed sensing (CS) requires that the signal have a concise and extremely dense representation in some mathematical basis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is particularly well suited for CS approaches, owing to the flexibility of data collection in the spatial frequency (Fourier) domain available in most MRI protocols. With custom CS acquisition and reconstruction strategies, one can quickly obtain a small subset of the full data and then iteratively reconstruct images that are consistent with the acquired data and sparse by some measure. Successful use of CS results in a substantial decrease in the time required to collect an individual image. This extra time can then be harnessed to increase spatial resolution, temporal resolution, signal-to-noise, or any combination of the three. In this article, we first review the salient features of CS theory and then discuss the specific barriers confronting CS before it can be readily incorporated into clinical quantitative MRI studies of cancer. We finally illustrate applications of the technique by describing examples of CS in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.

Citing Articles

Simultaneous spatial and temporal regularization in low-dose dynamic contrast-enhanced CT cerebral perfusion studies.

Murase K, Nakamoto A, Tomiyama N J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 24(6):e13983.

PMID: 37025069 PMC: 10243341. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13983.


Feasibility of accelerated 3D T1-weighted MRI using compressed sensing: application to quantitative volume measurements of human brain structures.

Yarach U, Saekho S, Setsompop K, Suwannasak A, Boonsuth R, Wantanajittikul K MAGMA. 2021; 34(6):915-927.

PMID: 34181119 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-021-00939-8.


Two-dimensional XD-GRASP provides better image quality than conventional 2D cardiac cine MRI for patients who cannot suspend respiration.

Piekarski E, Chitiboi T, Ramb R, Latson Jr L, Bhatla P, Feng L MAGMA. 2017; 31(1):49-59.

PMID: 29067539 PMC: 5814357. DOI: 10.1007/s10334-017-0655-7.


Quantitative Evaluation of Temporal Regularizers in Compressed Sensing Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of the Breast.

Wang D, Arlinghaus L, Yankeelov T, Yang X, Smith D Int J Biomed Imaging. 2017; 2017:7835749.

PMID: 28932236 PMC: 5592397. DOI: 10.1155/2017/7835749.


Technical Note: Evaluation of pre-reconstruction interpolation methods for iterative reconstruction of radial k-space data.

Tian Y, Erb K, Adluru G, Likhite D, Pedgaonkar A, Blatt M Med Phys. 2017; 44(8):4025-4034.

PMID: 28543266 PMC: 5862392. DOI: 10.1002/mp.12357.


References
1.
Padhani A, Liu G, Koh D, Chenevert T, Thoeny H, Takahara T . Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia. 2009; 11(2):102-25. PMC: 2631136. DOI: 10.1593/neo.81328. View

2.
Chan R, Ramsay E, Cheung E, Plewes D . The influence of radial undersampling schemes on compressed sensing reconstruction in breast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 67(2):363-77. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23008. View

3.
Cheson B, Horning S, Coiffier B, Shipp M, Fisher R, Connors J . Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17(4):1244. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.4.1244. View

4.
Smith D, Gore J, Yankeelov T, Welch E . Real-Time Compressive Sensing MRI Reconstruction Using GPU Computing and Split Bregman Methods. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2012; 2012:864827. PMC: 3296267. DOI: 10.1155/2012/864827. View

5.
Lee H, Lee D, Kang H, Kim B, Chung M . Sparse brain network recovery under compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011; 30(5):1154-65. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2140380. View